Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (190597)	4/4/2016 9:36:49 AM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 224744

right Kenneth. I can smell the seals sizzling.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (190597)	4/4/2016 9:54:52 AM
From: weatherguru	4 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Investor Clouseau TideGlider Woody_Nickels Respond to of 224744

I'm glad you give satellites credence. I posted an explanation on cause-and-effect of El Nino and the expression of heat. Heat is being expressed into the atmosphere and dissipating. CO2 has nothing to do with it. Message 30519978 Yes, Feb & Mar were warmest respective months on satellite record for global temperature. Remember, satellites also point out that 2014 and 2015 were not the warmest years on the satellite record, so satellites records expose NOAA and NASA's purported surface records. Why? Satellites can measure the entire troposphere. Even NOAA shows plots that warming is greatest at the surface, and the trend in the mid- to upper-troposphere is nearly negligible, which is completely against the concept man-made global warming. Here's the plot and link from NOAA. TUT = temperature of upper troposphere, and TMT is temperature of middle troposphere. As I always have said, there has been warming from 1978. However, comparing the mid- and upper-troposphere to the fabricated surface records, NASA & NOAA are creating 10-fold trends. That's alarmist fraud. star.nesdis.noaa.gov And when you're committing fraud, you have to be careful of what you say, such as admitting the troposphere is supposed to warm faster than the surface. Do you think Gavin responded? LOL! He usually blocks and deletes these tweets, so you have to be fast with screen shots.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (190597)	4/4/2016 12:03:27 PM
From: TideGlider	3 Recommendations Recommended By FJB GROUND ZERO™ locogringo Respond to of 224744

51% of Democrats Oppose Their Party’s Superdelegate System in Politics FacebookTwitterEmail thisShareThis Related Articles Daily Presidential Tracking Poll Hillary Meter: It’s Clinton’s Race Now Are U.S. Elections Fair? Voters Want More Say In Choosing Their Leaders Superdelegates, Yes; Trump, No 76% of GOP Voters Rate Their Own Congress as Out of Touch Sign up for free daily updates Monday, April 04, 2016 The presidential primary process to choose the Democratic nominee includes the use of superdelegates, individuals selected by the party who can support any candidate at the party's convention regardless of who wins their state's popular vote. But just over half of Democrats cry foul at the system. Only 30% of Likely Democratic Voters favor the use of superdelegates in the presidential primary process, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Fifty-one percent (51%) are opposed, while a sizable 19% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.) Among all voters, just 19% support the superdelegate system, while 65% are opposed. Sixteen percent (16%) are not sure. The Democratic National Committee’s decision to use superdelegates, many of whom are current and past elected officials, has come under considerable scrutiny - particularly from supporters of Bernie Sanders - for the appearance that the party is trying to rig the election for establishment candidate Hillary Clinton. DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz has done little to assuage these concerns, saying in one CNN interview that the superdelegates “exist really to make sure that party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activists.” Interestingly, voters under 40, perhaps the biggest voting bloc for Sanders, are more supportive of the superdelegate system than their elders. Twenty-four percent (24%) of these voters support the use of superdelegates, compared to 16% of middle-aged voters and 20% of senior citizens. But these younger voters are also the most likely to be undecided about the party's current superdelegate system. (Want a free daily e-mail update ? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook. The survey of 1,000 Likely U.S. Voters was conducted on March 30-31, 2016 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology. Democrats are more certain than ever that Hillary Clinton will be their party’s presidential nominee this November. Seventy-five percent (75%) of Republicans and 71% of voters not affiliated with either major political party oppose the use of superdelegates in the presidential primary process. But superdelegates may be just the solution for Republican party leaders who have a Trump problem. Thirty percent (30%) of self-described politically liberal voters favor the superdelegate process, compared to 21% of moderates and 12% of conservatives. Sixty-four percent (64%) of Democrats think their elected leaders in Congress are doing a good job representing their party’s values, while only 30% say their representatives have lost touch with the party’s base. By comparison, 76% of GOP voters think their lawmakers are out of touch. Only 41% of all voters now think American elections are fair. Most voters have said for years that member of Congress almost always get reelected because the election rules are rigged to benefit incumbents, not because they do a good job representing their constituents. At the same time, 55% think the United States is more democratic than most other nations.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (190597)	4/4/2016 1:51:14 PM
From: FJB	2 Recommendations Recommended By TideGlider tonto Respond to of 224744

HILLARY'S FRUSTRATION GROWS, AS PRIMARY RACE CONTINUES... Rhetoric turns bitter...

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (190597)	4/5/2016 10:29:19 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 224744

32 degrees here in DC at 10:30 in april

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (190597)	4/5/2016 10:33:36 AM
From: longnshort	4 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Investor Clouseau weatherguru Woody_Nickels Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224744

what a loser your pres. is White House designates Extreme Heat Week 8 twitchy

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (190597)	4/5/2016 10:38:16 AM
From: weatherguru	4 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Investor Clouseau isopatch TideGlider Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224744

In the 'sizzling' northlands during the hottest year in history, sportswriters want more opening day baseball games in southern cities. It's not sizzling enough. cbssports.com Speaking of sizzling, Ithaca's previous coldest temperature ever for all of April was 11F in 1982. That's now been broken (along with daily record low). I'm sure others wish for that 81F record high in 1928.