Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (933721)	5/6/2016 11:28:49 AM
From: Wharf Rat	2 Recommendations Recommended By SeachRE Stock Puppy Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572601

"allows the far east to become neuclearized? " Why not Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, too?

To: Alighieri who wrote (933721)	5/6/2016 12:38:39 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By PKRBKR Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572601

Al, Which foreign interest do you think will step in when he leaves NATO or allows the far east to become neuclearized? a) How different is Trump's advocacy of leaving NATO with Obama's de-emphasis of America's role as the superpower and "Globocop"? The fact that you think America plays a critical role in NATO says a lot about how much you still believe in American "exceptionalism." b) How is allowing the Far East to become nuclearized much different than Obama allowing the Middle East to become nuclearized? Face it, Trump is actually closer to Obama in terms of foreign policy than you might think. Funny thing is that Trump may end up actually bombing fewer countries than Obama did. Tenchusatsu

To: Alighieri who wrote (933721)	5/6/2016 1:38:47 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1572601

>> Which foreign interest do you think will step in when he leaves NATO or allows the far east to become neuclearized? In truth I don't think the donald understands much about what he has advocated...and his character is sufficiently flawed that it would not be surprising to find him ignoring the advice of the people around him who might...come to think of it I don't even believe that he has the knowledge to chose suitable people to advise him...much like bush...this is a really dangerous man. The comments to which you have made reference are clearly negotiating tactics. No one is leaving NATO. But he is saying, "If you want us to protect you you need to chip in." I agree with that. We have interests, but so do the protected countries. Similarly, no one is encouraging nuclearization of anything. But he is taking a hard line on defending a region that is far away from us then paying through the nose for the petroleum. This is the problem with the Left. You don't know shit about negotiating. It is why Barack obama has left our foreign policy in a shambles.