Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (953088)	8/2/2016 3:48:45 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1586531

It is the same problem as with gun laws. Reasonable ones are fine. But when they constitute an attempt to make gun ownership more difficult (e.g., like recent interest in requiring "insurance", which is stupid) then it crosses the line. Mere disproportionality is insufficient. We've seen these kinds of figures misused by demagogues like Obama and Clinton. But disproportionality combined with an apparent intent to to make it more difficult for specifically blacks to register is obviously not right. Still, reasonable registration measures like requiring a standardized, scannable voter ID makes good sense and does not in any way discriminate. That it discriminates is a liberal lie. That's about all there is to it. Courts are so politicized at this point a liberal court will do anything to put more blacks in the voting booth. we know that. I don't know why the far left nutjobs like yourself can't just be a little bit reasonable.