Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (7598)	12/31/1997 4:29:00 PM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 11098

Can any of the longtime followers of this stock tell me what PRST's PE , P/S, P/B etc. was at it's absolute peak? (200 pre-split) I'm not going to use the info to rank on PRST. I am doing a case study. Thanks in advance if anyone can answer.

To: E who wrote (7598)	12/31/1997 4:40:00 PM
From: Larry Ricker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11098

<<The "especially when" in your post seems to connect the two events. Like, "Howard did something wrong therefore whatever Hollingsworth and Lustig did is okay or harmless," or some such concept, is apparently your point. I don't agree with it, in fact find it peculiar.>> That is not my point. In fact, it seems to be the attitude of Nanny and others to brush off the SEC charges against PRST and its officers by saying that the shorts were doing similar things. I'm glad you don't see it that way. I also agree that earnings are going to determine the price of PRST shares in the long run. I can't see how a legal action against selected shorts could help long-term PRST earnings. That was my point. Larry