SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (968374)9/29/2016 9:31:33 AM
From: Land Shark  Respond to of 1573911
 
Nonsense.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (968374)9/29/2016 9:32:17 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573911
 
Spiegel: Experts Slam Proclamations Of An Anthropocene As “Political”… “Unscientific”…”Science Sloganeering”!

By P Gosselin on 28. September 2016

Science journalist and geologist Axel Bojanowski at the online German Spiegel news weekly comments on the drive by activists to proclaim an “Anthropocene” age because they claim that man has so much altered the planet and is adding a new geological layer in doing so.

It all stems from accusations that man has altered the surface of the earth, its biodiversity, the oceans and atmosphere through its activity, and that this is becoming visible in the earth’s most recent geological layer.

But Bojanowski writes that a number of leading experts are calling such claims erroneous. In the subheading he writes:

Activists, artists and scientists are calling for the heralding of a new age – man has profoundly altered the planet. They’re wrong.”

He writes that these experts view the newly proposed geological designation as “a momentous error and unacceptable influence on research by political activists. It’s the story of a large misunderstanding.”

Already policymakers and leaders are scrambling to adopt the new designation and thus enact laws accordingly, he reports. And why not? A number of scientists and everywhere the media are already using the term.

Even the Scientific Advisory Council to the German government, WBGU — headed by PIK alarmist Hans-Joachim Schellnhuber — liberally uses the term. There is a push to officiailly declare the “Anthropocene” as a geological age. Bojanowski reports that seven years ago 37 scientists began a working group charged with searching out geological evidence to support adopting the “Anthropocene” age: the Anthropocene Commission.

According to the Spiegel journalist, the commission, headed by Jan Zalasiewicz of the University of Leicester, will attempt to convince three geological commissions to adopt the age, which supposedly started at about 1950. Journal “Science” has already presented the first results, the Spiegel journalist writes.

But Bojanwski adds that a large number of experts are calling the move “bad science” because it does not meet any of the strict geological scientific standards one typically uses for establishing geological periods.

“Sloganeering in science “

Bojanowski cites James Scourse, ocean geologist at Bangor University in Wales, who says the term is “misleading and useless” and that Earth is shaped by factors well beyond the control of man. Other experts like Whitney Autin of Suny-College in New York and John Holbrook of Texas Christian University call the discussion an esoteric debate, claiming, Bojanowski reports, that today there’s a “tendency towards sloganeering in science” which lead to “dubious terminology” like “Anthropocene“.

“Career promoter”

Spiegel journalist Bojanowski writes:

From the perspective of critics, the Anthropocene concept violates almost every scientific rule.

He then quotes geologist Sven Egenhoff of Colorado State University:

The Anthropocene mode has only been able to emerge because scientists from other fields have been piling on behind the term. To the contrary, the real experts, i.e. those who specialize in earth layers, see nothing there. The Anthropocene serves as a career promoter for scientists in outside fields.”


- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/#sthash.P3tW3v1b.dpuf



To: Brumar89 who wrote (968374)9/29/2016 10:21:20 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573911
 
Acknowledging that you are in denial is the first step on the road to recovery.

It’s More than Climate Denial. It’s Pathology
September 28, 2016


Associated Press:

Donald Trump’s running mate is breaking with the Republican nominee’s claim that climate change is not the result of human activity.

Vice presidential nominee Mike Pence said Tuesday “there’s no question” that human activity affects both the climate and the environment.

At Monday’s presidential debate, Democrat Hillary Clinton challenged Trump’s views, saying: “Donald thinks that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. I think it’s real.” Trump interrupted with “I did not, I do not say that.”



But in 2012, Trump tweeted that the “concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.” He later claimed he was kidding, but he’s also repeated the assertion that climate change is a hoax benefiting China. And in 2014, Trump tweeted: “Snowing in Texas and Louisiana, record setting freezing temperatures throughout the country and beyond. Global warming is an expensive hoax!”

Trump’s campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, tried to move discussion away from those comments Tuesday, saying on CNN that Trump believes “that climate change is naturally occurring” but the causes are not man-made.

The world’s scientific organizations say the Earth’s climate is changing because of the buildup of heat-trapping gases, especially carbon dioxide, from the burning of coal, oil and gas.

Pence, appearing separately on CNN, said, “let’s follow the science,” but he warned against rushing into environmental restrictions that drive jobs out of the country and put Americans out of work.

Below, more astounding examples of serious cognitive break in the republican establishment. Is this the real “neurological disorder” we should be concerned about?

I used to say that climate denial was perhaps a neurological disorder like Autism, but some readers pointed out to me that Autism is a spectrum, and often a characteristic of some very capable and productive citizens.
So, I’m thinking it’s more related to Zombies, parasitic brain worms, or brain eating amoebas. Fruitful area for research.

Huffington Post:

How can someone deny having said something with such conviction when there is readily available evidence that he did? This is the question The Huffington Post posed to several of Trump’s surrogates after the debate ended Monday night. Here are their explanations.

Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.)HUFFPOST: During the debate Donald Trump definitively said that he never once said that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. But here is a tweet where he says just that. [We attempt to show her the tweet.]

BLACKBURN: Well, I don’t have my glasses on.

HP: Come on! OK, I’ll read it. [We read it.]



BLACKBURN: Well, many times when we talk about issues related to the climate, y’all have countries that would not be forced to come into compliance with some of these agreements. Then they will say they don’t have to abide by that, they plan to buy more coal.

HP: Do you believe that climate change is a hoax?

BLACKBURN: I do not believe in climate change. I think the Earth is in a cooling trend. It is not in a warming trend.



HP: You currently think the Earth is in a cooling trend?

BLACKBURN: It is in a cooling trend. It has cooled for about the past 10 years. And the thing that is so interesting is that when you say global warming or climate change, the climate will change. So yes, in that, I agree that it does. You have to ask, “Is it cyclical?”

HP: You know we’ve had about nine of the hottest years in the history of the planet have been in the past 10 years?

BLACKBURN: We have also seen the past 10 years a little bit of a cooling.

Note: The idea that the Earth is cooling is wrong.



Trump aide Sarah HuckabeeHP: [Reads her Trump’s tweet.]

HUCKABEE: I think what he said was, he didn’t think global warming was the number one threat to the world.

HP: He said, “I never said that.”

HUCKABEE: I’m sorry. I stepped out a couple times. I really don’t know what you’re talking about on that. The only global warming comment I heard was there at the end.

HP: Does he still believe global warming is a hoax? You’re a surrogate, you’ve got to represent him.

HUCKABEE: I’m not him. I’m his surrogate.

Republican National Committee senior strategist Sean SpicerHP: How does he say he never said climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese when there is this tweet?

SPICER: I didn’t follow that. I didn’t hear what actually happened.

HP: Does he still believe what he put in this tweet?

SPICER: I don’t know. You have to ask him.



Sen. David Purdue (R-Ga.)HP: How do you square the statement from the debate with this tweet?

PURDUE: You’ll have to ask him that. What he is really talking about is how unrealistic her expectation of switching to global green energy overnight is.

HP: But as a surrogate for the campaign, is the campaign’s position that climate change is a hoax?

PURDUE: Well, talk to the campaign

HP: You’re with the campaign.

PURDUE: I understand that. Right now, it is not proven. There are controversies about that. There are experts on both sides that will take opposing views on that. And for us to take the entire direction of our country and sacrifice our economy and put millions of people out of work because of something that they, the Democrats, are perpetrating, I find really irresponsible.

Note: The vast majority of scientific experts believe that climate change is real and that human activity is contributing to it.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.)HP: What do you make of him saying he never said that and the existence of this tweet?

SESSIONS: I’m not sure what he had in his mind when he said what he said. He has not been saying that recently. He has been respectful of it, but he does believe in all energy sources and many of those are CO2-producing energy sources.

HP: Is it the campaign’s belief that climate change is a hoax?

SESSIONS: Well, I’m going to tell you what I believe.

HP: But you’re here on the campaign’s behalf.

SESSIONS: I believe that we don’t need to be spending, making the taxpayers pay, much more money for their electricity from solar cells.

HP: But is it the campaign’s position that climate change is a hoax?

SESSIONS: No. I don’t think it is a hoax. What I say is climate change, the explanation the scientists gave for climate change, made some sense: that CO2 could be a greenhouse effect in causing the temperature to increase. However, 15 to 18 years have gone by and we haven’t seen anything like the predictions come true that they predicted.



climatecrocks.com