Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (123000)	10/15/2016 9:28:34 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 219846

Yes, w/r to this Message 28967756 matter We are in absolute alignment and fine calibration w/r to educating the state whenever actually able per slam dunk ducks in the barrel. Most of the time one can get seriously hurt for trying based on false belief that the state is fair. In any case, in the current case, given hk legal system and procedure, my so far effective standing up to the state have involved no legal fees, merely leveraging on the state's institutions and procedures to challenge the same state, and progressed to involving higher and higher officers of the state to decide how far down the rabbit hole they wish to go whilst knowing full well that a serious legal case shall greet and meet them at their sorry end should they fail to follow procedures. An independent body entity comprised of retired judges and such personage is now asking questions and getting at answers. Should the independent observers be dissatisfied then the whole mess ends up on the desk of the Chief Executive (final decider) of this freedom island and the police commissioner, which of course gets serious, especially w/i context of current social atmosphere. Should the case go that far, I aim to devote the necessary resources to invigorate the rule of law in Hong Kong and see all culprits legacy set in stone. The case is simple, and the high court already ruled once in my favor, throwing out the ruling by the lower court against what is right. The lower court judge is tainted by the high court ruling, I paraphrase, "... I read several times what you wrote, and I must admit, I do not know what you are trying to say ...", and the DoJ officers walked themselves into a position of untruth. All my evidence submitted are on government stationary, signed by officials. May he who dispenses justice be righteous and merciful The police has been caught in telling untruth, bias, and cover-up Ugly Aim to see perps in the civil service punished for evil deeds. All-in, and on record, on govt stationary

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (123000)	10/15/2016 10:22:20 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By Maurice Winn Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219846

For clarification, what happened between my 2013 filing of complaint against my accusers and now is essentially, and in black and white, on government stationary, that - I filed against the complainants for filing false police statements, and perjury, - embedded in the filing is complaint against certain police officers for improper investigation - the original investigation officer saw fit to take over the case and essentially close the books after a one year 'investigation' - I highlighted the impropriety to all supervisory officers involved case 1 against me, and case 2 for purjury by complainants - I admonished all officers to see wrong, do right, make right - admonishment ignored and what I got wa, "you seem to be insisting on an interminable case" - I then filed complaint through proper channels and by established procedure to tutor the officers what interminable can actually mean, especially when I have written proof of police lying, in writing, signed May he who dispenses justice have mercy but be righteous