Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (32605)	1/3/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Ron, again you didn't answer my question. You did say that, didn't you? It is a fact, isn't it? So why would you be so arrogant to think you're qualified to discuss fundamentals? It appears, admittingly, you're not! 1) What do you feel the implications of MVPH's share value will have on RMIL? 2) What do you see will inevitably become of PRTI, MVPH, RMCW & RMIL 3) How long before RMIL can move to the AMEX 4) What is Morks' alleged relationship to MVPH? OK...fundamentals...respond! <lol> Pugs

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (32605)	1/3/1998 11:30:00 AM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 55532

To: ovisusa@AOL.COM >>>>>To: michael d kugler (32487 ) From: Ron Reece Saturday, Jan 3 1998 1:25AM EST Reply # of 32519 Hey Mike, Tough dealing with Insomnia... too many late nights this week... :0) About those DVBC financials. I didn't see any discussion of the apparent liability that Mork is suing over with Zapara's shares. Did I miss something here?? I would think that if Mork had a severe short position, that would have to be reported in the company's financials. If he has misrepresented his financials, I would suspect the SEC will have something to say with him as well. Having an outstanding short position should show up as a liability or as an investment. Your comments?? Regards, Ron<<<<<<<< _______________________________________ What would you define Morks' relationship with MVPH , if any? What about PRTI? What is the relationship between Morks' private and public co.s' ? Why did Mork put out fradulant press releases concerning Ovis, do you think he 'MAY' have done the same with MVPH?, if so, why? AWATING YOUR RESPONSE. Pugs

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (32605)	1/3/1998 11:57:00 AM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

I thought you wanted to talk 'fundamentals', it appears you only want to slam. __________________________________________________ >>>>Subj: REECE Date: 98-01-02 16:43:58 EST From: XXXXXXXX To: PugsTKO Pugs, This is my final one I finally found it. In this one Reece scolds people for selling, keeps hyping the stock until finally even he admits its a scam..........what a piece of work. Again a lot of people were hurt because of this windbag. Take Care & Good Luck To: Ron Reece (4433 ) From: Bob Bennett Friday, Apr 25 1997 4:22AM EST Reply # of 8378 The following are on the MCUP Board under Company Research on AOL. These are just a few of the highlights but it makes for a very interesting read. Just a suggestion for any of you that want to do your "DUE DILIGENCE". They start from about a year ago. Subj: Re:MCI and MSU Date: 96-04-02 01:10:24 EDT From: RReece7297 ERRRR..... HUMMMMM..... Me thinks Peter K F is suffering a bit of confusion here. We're talking MSU Corporation. :) BTW, I'm not telling people not to take profits. Nothing wrong with selling half and reclaiming your principle. Let's just not get nervous and throw the baby out with the bath.... My basic point is that the run in the stock has more upward momentum potential given that news of a licensing contract is due out soon. As well as the believable scuttlebutt about them wanting to apply for NASDAQ listing. This provides a level of support which we shouldn't ignore. Don't sell hoping that the stock will go back down to $2. I don't believe it will. It might, (I say might) see $3 briefly, but that is not apparent by the looks of its behavior today. Also, take a look at SOLV news and I think that you will see some hesitation on the part of manipulative short sellers to try to drive the price down again. Ron >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subj: Big things coming quickly... Date: 96-04-05 16:52:39 EDT From: RReece7297 Folks, I don't know how much I can say, in order not to create any problems for my source. I have offered only honest opinions in the past, and offer only honest ones now. I spent 5 hours last night speaking with an individual who is intimately aware of the MSU's technology. Most of that time we spent bouncing new ideas for the Netbox off of each other. My source will soon be monitoring this folder as AOL just became available in the UK. I learned a hell of a lot, and I can tell you that their is some serious brainstorming going on over there that may make this an even bigger play than any of us previous expected. It may not be quite another Netscape, but their are distinct similarities as to possible revenue generation. Remember that at this moment MSU is strictly an R&D company with 75% of it's 12 million shares restricted from trading until Oct, 96. Believe me, I want to say more, but I need to confer with my source before elaborating. I can say that these people are extremely talented, and their working environment is quite similiar to workaholic mentality of the programmers at Netscape. In fact, I can tell you that they are working through the holiday. more in the next post. Ron >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subj: MSU is drafting a reponse!!! Date: 96-05-15 12:24:13 EDT From: RReece7297 Am I glad that our newsletter members are quick to inform me what being said!!! I got an e-mail this morning from several members with the text of the post, and immediately forwarded it to Patricial Meding at Forte. I just got off the phone with both her and "Bo" O'Brien who did the original analyst write-up for MSU, and they are both shocked at what was posted. Patricia said that there will be a response available today. She has notified management and ..... well, I let her say her piece before I interject my comments. All I can say is that Go 4 2 better be able to back up what he is saying...... Regards, Ron "The MSU Muse e-mail to subscribe reecerd@nmaa.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subj: Re:MUCP Date: 96-07-03 15:55:11 EDT From: RReece7297 DJVezza, If you're scooping the 'ol Muse here, then you have inside information, and I would be very careful what you say... :0) I don't know what news would drive the price up that high at this stage. If it hits $18-20, I would hesitate to believe that it would stay there. It would require AWESOME news to do that. But who knows... This stock seems to have a cult following. I spoke with Charlie McLaughlin today, and he said I should call him back on Monday for a possible update. I read this as something is up, but he doesn't want is posted all over the net, at least not yet. But is shear speculation on my part. Pat and Charlie are extremely cautious about hyping the stock. They prefer to work behind the scenes. And from the look of the price, they have done a fantastic job. Charlie told me they have several institutional investors in the stock which may account for the relative stability and price support. Market Makers have to be careful when the big boys are involved.... Now if they can do the same for there other "Golden Child" Green Oasis (GRNO) which I also own stock in. Check them out, the time to buy is now while the price is low. Regards, Ron The MSU Muse SKIPPING FORWARD>>>>>>>>>> Subj: Re:Global Financial Traders Date: 97-03-15 01:24:29 EDT From: RReece7297 Being investigated by the SEC for their involvement in a motorcycle(??) company in which GFT officers held approx 40% of the stock. They were promoting it, basically front-running for their own trading activities. Where there is smoke there is fire, and MSU will suffer greatly, I predict, for associating itself with the types of individuals that they have. I have personally met Mike Reilly from GFT and needless to say, was "underwhelmed". ( I think someone told me that he used to be a car dealer or something.... :0) This can only bring attention to trading activities in MSU, which GFT was rumoured to have 250,000 shares of. Where they got them, no one really will say. If true. Sorry to say it myself, but I tried to warn you that karma would eventually catch up to this company. I am also sad to say that Wyn Holloway failed to take my advice (like he would listen to a measly shareholder) and distance himself from these jokers. I told him this last May when I actually met him in NYC. Regards, Ron He told em in May ---But he was thier cheerleader all summer, possibly till some people could unload----interesting read, like I said. I know this situation been mentioned here before, but the read is worth the time. _

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (32605)	1/3/1998 12:07:00 PM
From: Rich_1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Rmil shareholders have not hyped this stock. We never told you or anyone else to buy this stock. We spend all our time challenging your rediculous remarks. Please prove to us with facts. For someone who does not own a single share of RMIL, the Shorters must be paying you plenty or else you simply have nothing better to do with your time. Since I believe that can't possibly be a fool, then you must be on the Shorters' payroll too. Rich_1 Message from Ron Reece on Jan 3 1998 11:15AM EST For the same reasons that you all have HYPED the hypothesis of a HUGE SHORT SQUEEZE that will rocket this stock to $60-100 immeditately. For every hypothesis, there must be someone to discuss the alternatives. I have chosen to be that person for as long you folks continue to deny that fundamentals matter. Would you care to assert your beliefs more forcefully and directly rather than asking questions that have already been answered?? Regards, Ron

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (32605)	1/3/1998 6:54:00 PM
From: J Krnjeu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Mr. Ron Reece <<For the same reasons that you all have HYPED the hypothesis of a HUGE SHORT SQUEEZE that will rocket this stock to $60-100 immeditately. I have chosen to be that person for as long you folks continue to deny that fundamentals matter.>> What is fundamental to short squeeze, is that more stock was sold by the MM than was issued by the company. That has always been the position of the longs and I don't recall the longs not willing to discuss that issue. Thank you JK