Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (360)	1/3/1998 5:21:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4710

OFF TOPIC I love that...If I ever post here again it will always be off topic. If we were all to do that it would be a marvelous thread, methinks. I must admit that the pulp version of Roget does not use imply as a synonym for infer. The Thesauri available on various websites are of no use to a serious questioner. So I must infer that the implied validity of Roget is overstated....either that or I could be in error. Now, should that be I should imply that the inferred validity of Roget is overstated? In any event, Roget was probably French anyway and had no idea how to put on a butterfly spread.