Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (983655)	11/23/2016 6:55:02 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583391

strained jam you posted a lot of babble but no link to any info showing how that some few parts in 10,000 increase from anthropogenic CO2 sources will raise global temperature several degrees. Any analysis of past ice core data show CO2 changes lagging temperature. The accepted conjecture is that CO2 is released from the Oceans as it warms. The link of CO2 raising global temperatures is conjectured by the computer models. There is no data showing any CO2 driving temperature increases. Fact a H2O molecule is 100 times at least more a green house gas than A CO2 molecule. There are hundreds of CO2 molecules in the air for every CO2, that's besides the ice crystals and rain drops in the atmosphere. You will see no difference in the heating of air in a glass box based upon the amount of CO2 within. You will see faster cooling proportional to the amount of H20 in said box when the external radiant source is removed. The heating of the air in the box will be a function of the heating of the surfaces of the box and the trapping of the heat within by the restriction of convection of air in the box.