SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Heywood40 who wrote (195399)11/28/2016 8:47:35 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

  Respond to of 224888
 
I was curious why you used "New York". I think much of the acceleration in usage was due to lowering qualifications for the program nation wide. I would guess New York has a higher standard of living, but I doubt a president has the authority to deal directly and individually with a states qualifications. That is likely the domain of the Department of Agriculture.



To: Heywood40 who wrote (195399)11/28/2016 10:42:40 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck5 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Investor Clouseau
locogringo
TideGlider
Woody_Nickels

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224888
 
"How many people are on food stamps is directly related to the wishes of the president in office, and are not necessarily indicative of anything other than the administration's desire to help feed the poor.

Garbage. The amount of people on food stamps is directly related to the amount of unemployed. A reflection of an administrations failed policies.