Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (986667)	12/10/2016 2:06:25 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583764

>>>But assume that you are right, <<< OK, give me a second to get my head around that... ... ... got it. I am right. >>>what specifically would you do about it? <<< I have already said that congress is able to enact laws to protect the environment from pollution. I would have them do their jobs. >>>Any abuse that the EPA may have engaged in was the result of our democracy. But we don't know of any better system of government than a democracy.<<< By any abuse you mean the monstrously out of control efforts to enrich political constituencies unethically and subvert the issue it was designed to serve. It is a result of our government being allowed to overreach in a corrupt and insidious manner. If government was all knowing, benevolent, and all powerful we could just turn every issue over to the government and say "fix-it" and be done with it (your approach/flawed belief). Some issues are not meant to be put into the hands of government to be fixed. Government is necessary for some issues, like those that require us (as a society) to come together in order to find a solution and implement such a solution that is universally beneficial. In this case we must take care to restrict government so as to guard against overreach, ALWAYS.