Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (13770)	12/12/2016 3:22:01 PM
From: jiggydo	1 Recommendation Recommended By hoperrs Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Clyde , does the truth bother you? Do prefer the untruths be posted for the newbies that may get sucked in, is that your leanings ?

To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (13770)	12/12/2016 3:48:19 PM
From: the Chief	3 Recommendations Recommended By Gilmar1 hoperrs pop123 Respond to of 22811

Not true, what I said was I would not speak of Zenyatta, in this case that you have highlighted I have confined my comments to the data. 1) There is a difference between the industrial Synthetic and High purity Synthetic. 2) IF the company in question is comparing itself too "Industrial Synthetic" then it is not competing in the Synthetic market as stated 3) The lower your cutoff purity the higher the consumption at the lower purities in Industrial Synthetic are.So if they are competing against Industrial Synthetics then they are the top of the heap. Unfortunately Industrial Synthetics command no real pricing at all. 4) The lower your cutoff purity is in the "REAL HIGH PURITY Synthetic Market, the lower the consumption is, so the 1500K tons is a misleading comment unless a straddle is planned? 5) So the company in question is straddling the Industrial vs High Purity Synthetic market and attempting to be part of one no matter how low their grade by lowering the grade of Synthetic without informing you that they are talking about Low Grade Industrial Synthetic thats a "baddy".

To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (13770)	12/12/2016 3:54:02 PM
From: the Chief	1 Recommendation Recommended By hoperrs Respond to of 22811

So Clyde, the question is, did you know there are a species called "Industrial Synthetics" that fit below the 99.9% cutoff point? ie 99.87% If so, then can you explain how at ~99.9% that the market is still 1500K tons please, take your time. xrdcarbon.com

To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (13770)

12/13/2016 12:48:15 AM

From: Shoto

2 Recommendations

Recommended By
GrumpyGus
hoperrs

Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 22811

"only untruth here"

Then what do you call this bullshit?

To: Luvin_It who wrote (2308)	5/27/2015 4:23:20 PM
From: Glorieux	12 Recommendations of 2328

"ZEN here is very fortunate that we have nuclear grade and isotropy right out of the ground!

choo choo

G.

I'd say that was world class bullshit to beat all others. Even Musky's 242 trillion doesn't even come close. Nuclear grade and isotropy right out of the ground?

And of course 12 recs......Wow! I luv you guys.