Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (989613)	12/22/2016 4:01:33 AM
From: James Seagrove	6 Recommendations Recommended By dave rose FJB i-node jlallen Mick Mørmøny and 1 more member Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1570135

Koan supports special needs low IQ minority students like Elizabeth Warren who lied to get into Harvard and continues to lie to this day.

To: i-node who wrote (989613)	12/22/2016 5:22:23 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Respond to of 1570135

koan is a fake, a typical pseudo intellect who knows nothing about anything but pretends to know everything about everything, the typical left wing "know it all" nut job... liberals are not capable of disagreeing, they don't know how... they don't disagree, they disapprove... as if somehow their position is always superior, smarter, better, and anyone who disagrees is deplorable (remember???), not worthy, and a low life racist and/or whatever else... Just look at their overall violent behavior and reaction to an election result, they can't handle reality, they prefer to whine, moan, insult, demean, cry, tantrum, destroy property, murder police, riot, and so on... Their day of reckoning is coming quickly, and it will not end pretty for them... GZ

To: i-node who wrote (989613)

12/22/2016 1:21:16 PM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570135

It was not a passively racist remark and you could not make the deduction you did. You were looking to cause trouble. You made the racist remarks to begin with , with your bell curve crap. And for some reason you try to paint me with the brush as well. Don't do it again.

And I included everybody in there including Caucasians, but you didn't say a thing about Caucasians you went straight to African-Americans trying to do a gotcha.

You do not post in good faith.

I was speaking to the Asian culture and how they value education and push their kids to get educated. The Jews do the same thing. And it has nothing to do with being lazy for anyone. In your mind you think that is a logical deduction and it isn't e.g. the cultural aspect, or economic variable, which you never considered.

My point was that the reason Asians do so well in school, in my opinion, is simply because education and philosophy and hard work are part of their culture and forces and motivates them to work very hard to get educated.

You pulled that logical deduction trying to make my comment racist. . There are lots of reasons why some people do better than others based on their culture, or their economic situation, or racism.

Africans in Africa, do not have many of the same problems as African-Americans because they are not subject to constant racism.

<<

What you did was to make a passively racist comment. I didn't stoop to calling you racist. I simply pointed out that you clearly implied, without the slightest doubt, that demographics other than Asians work less hard, and the clear implication is that whites don't work as hard as Asians and blacks don't work as hard as either Asians or whites.

All this to avoid the scientific conclusion, that there are differences among these racial groupings in IQ.

In the end you resorted to the non-scientific conclusion.

Your solution may be to put me on ignore, but that could explain why you seem to be uneducable. When someone challenges you, instead of learning you react by turning away. This is a key difference between Left and right today. The Left tend not to listen and learn, while the right tends to hear out both sides of an argument.