SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (3065)12/22/2016 11:27:25 AM
From: Steve Lokness  Respond to of 362393
 
<<<< I was so engrossed in the book that I read the whole thing in one sitting>>>>

I have a new respect for your mind! .............You sure you aren't mixing this up with Harry Potter book or maybe even a Beatrix Potter book? <smile>



To: Lane3 who wrote (3065)12/22/2016 12:12:34 PM
From: Lane31 Recommendation

Recommended By
one_less

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362393
 
Today's heavy reading.

marginalrevolution.com

Claims about the Culture Wars by Tyler Cowen on December 22, 2016 at 12:02 am in Current Affairs, Education, Philosophy, Religion | Permalink



Maybe understanding that opposition from the other tribe was not the reason for failure can help overcome polarization?

  • Your counterculture did not fail because the other counterculture opposed it. (They did, but that’s not why.)
  • Your counterculture failed because the majority did not agree with it.
  • The majority rejected your counterculture because it was plainly wrong about many things.
  • It would help if you understood how younger generations relate to meaningness; they are right that some of your main issues are illusory.
  • You need to let go of the sacred myths of your tribe. Decades ago they inspired genuinely positive social change, but now they produce only frustration and hatred and stalemate. Everyone born after 1970 thinks they are idiotic. You are stuck pretending to believe, but even you secretly know they aren’t true.
  • Your counterculture and the other one also agree about many things!
  • Some of what you agree about is wrong; you should admit that and drop it.
  • Some of what you agree about is right; you should work together to support it.
  • Much of what you imagine you fight about is symbolic, not substantive. Your advocacy of these issues is mostly a statement of tribal identity, and claims for high status within your tribe.
  • When your symbolic issues blow up into actual political conflicts, often you are fighting to establish tribal dominance, not to accomplish pragmatic improvements in society.
  • If you understand what you really disagree about, and why, you may be able to find pragmatic compromises, instead of both sides demanding total victory.
While the piece (who wrote it?) is uneven in parts, it is both interesting and important. Here is the whole on-line manuscript. Here is the critique of Bayesianism as Eternalism. For the pointer I thank Jake Seliger.