Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (127962)	1/9/2017 3:35:59 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 220353

Trump's idiotic government mandate for industry to convert back to coal from natural gas as a primary fuel is being dressed-up as a contrarian point of view to global warming. But it's nothing more than an attempt to impose a very costly fuel on industries which long ago began the conversion to natural gas due to its significantly lower costs. You've merely succumbed to Trump group-think. Trump's government coal mandate will fail. The oil and gas industry will see to that, as will their customers. In any case Trump is far too busy posting petty Tweets to Meryl Streep, Arnold Schwarzeneggar and other show business entities which compete with his past reality TV shows and following events surrounding his new hotel in Dubai to be bothered with running any government business.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (127962)	1/9/2017 9:32:02 PM
From: GPS Info	2 Recommendations Recommended By Alex MG benwood Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 220353

The problem with 'intelligence' services is confirmation bias, group think, fear of opposing the official ideas, stupidity, Stockholm Syndrome. I have little respect for your opinions, and that's all you have here. If I were to ask about how the Stockholm Syndrome applies to intelligence services, all I would get is more BS. Hence CO2 mania has been running for decades There is no "hence." This is just another one of your continuous conflations. You think you are right about group think in the intelligence business "hence" you are right about global warming. You can also be wrong about either topic or both. Being right about one topic doesn't make you logically right about the other. Meanwhile, on RT right now, NATO is gearing up for World War III, possibly even before Obama is finished. Yes, I know you believe what you watch on RT, but you are easily manipulated by post-Soviet propaganda. He would love to go out with a Big Bang. He apparently doesn't know about Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Charge of the Light Brigade, Barbarossa. It's totally MAD but that's what NATO are doing. Of course you don't have any clue about Obama's plans for NATO before he leaves office. This is your fanciful mind spewing nonsense out of pure boredom. You just can't help yourself, and start writing about the Charge of the Light Brigade and Operation Barbarossa. This is just more of your nonsense. What will NATO attack with a Light Brigade? Will they attack a heavily defended artillery battery? Will they forget to use reconnaissance satellites and drones to determine the strength of the enemy? Why do you always write this nonsense? Do you think there is enough manpower in NATO to invade Russia and hold territory. Do you consider the breakaway regions of Ukraine to be Russian territory now? Given your supposed expertise, where exactly will NATO attack Russia? How do NATO members attack Russia without provocation or a UN resolution? What is the historical precedent for NATO attacking Russia, given that the NATO members on the boarder with Russia would suffer the highest casualties?