Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (9364)	2/2/2017 9:09:49 PM
From: one_less	2 Recommendations Recommended By Dracin72 i-node Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 364471

>>>"There you go again. Hillary was Secretary of State. Do you honestly think a SoS would say something like that without the approval of the president? "<<< Are you guys a tag team? Hillary was SoS, she had to have had the endorsement of Obama to engage in operations. I did not go there again but feel free to couch my position as you please, as if it makes a difference. Obama made it clear before he was in office that he intended to open communications with Iran. That was while his predecessor had made it clear that all options were on the table. So, most rational people saw that as opposing positions. Obama did open communications resulting in the payment to Iran of 1.7 billion dollars in appeasement. If you want to lay military operations at Hillary's feet with shared responsibility to Obama then fine. That is fair even though Obama obviously made every effort to stay out of that lime light. So, do you believe Hillary/Obama presented Trump with a successfully managed military history? In the interests of the USA did she/they leave things better than she found them: Items Syria, Libia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, North Korea, Yemen, Sudan? Item by item the answer is 'No.'