To: Brumar89 who wrote (74687 ) 2/6/2017 11:10:43 AM From: Brumar89 Read Replies (3) | Respond to Heat’s On At NOAA As “High Level Whistle Blower” Exposes Data Fraud, “Scientific Integrity Breaches”! By P Gosselin on 5. February 2017A SUNDAY MORNING BOMBSHELL According to a just published article by the Online Mail of the UK here , a “high-level whistleblower ” has disclosed that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) “breached its own rules on scientific integrity ” and “duped ” world leaders with manipulated global warming data. the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015 ,” the Sunday Online Mail writes.“Irrefutable evidence” impeccable ” NOAA scientist Dr. John Bates , who has shown “irrefutable evidence ” that an NOAA paper showing accelerating global warming was rushed to be published just before the Paris Conference in 2015, and was “based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data “. The paper became to be known as the “Pausebuster” and was central in spurring the 2015 Paris Treaty.Central African data made up entirely Tony Heller presented at his realclimatescience blog strong evidence that the government agency manipulated December 2016 data in order to make it “red hot ” in Central Africa, “with record heat “. However, the problem is that there are no measurement stations whatsoever located in the vast region, and so the NOAA simply made up and filled in the hot data.the NOAA’s record hot regions in Africa were actually close to normal “.Figure above: The heated data that the NOAA reported to the public. NOAA data actually recorded by thermometer (Source of above charts: realclimatescience.com . is fake ” and that the “NOAA has almost no temperature data from Africa, and none from central Africa. They simply made up the record temperatures .”Flawed datasets two new temperature sets of data “, both of which were “flawed .” The Online Mail adds that the paper used “unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming” and that “revised data will show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend “.the computer used to process the software had suffered a complete failure.’ The reason for the failure is unknown, but it means the Pausebuster paper can never be replicated or verified by other scientists. “www.dailymail.co.uk/ .- See more at: notrickszone.com
