To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (131336 ) 3/4/2017 2:04:22 PM From: Elroy Jetson Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 217515 To be sure, voluntarily lying under oath is not an indication of intelligence. Haim, due to your personal past history and experience you may, or may not, be very familiar with the laws of the United States. In my past work career I've often been an expert witness for clients so I've been paid to answer questions under oath on many occasions and during depositions asked hours of tedious questions under oath for days. Given the fees I was charging I would have been content to be testify under oath for years at a time. Although I'm not an an attorney, it's assumed I know I can't lie under oath and I know I face time in prison if I lie. I've never lied under oath - and it's not very complicated to understand. If you're under oath and someone asks if you've ever been to Washington DC, your answer has to be yes unless you've never been there .A person who doesn't understand the law may think to themselves, I don't need to tell them I've been to DC because this isn't relevant to this inquiry, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with going to Washington DC, and plenty of other people have been there too, and most people I know wouldn't mind if I lied about this. A weasel answer would be, I don't recall at this time and I'll need to look at my records. The person who says something like this may know they're lying. But unless they later admit they actually did remember but lied anyway, there's no way they can be found guilty of perjury for not remembering.For someone who has no legal training a prosecutor will explain to them exactly what perjury is and what the penalties are and ask them if they wish to change their answer . An attorney doesn't get this "second chance" because by passing the Bar exam they've already demonstrated they know that perjury is lying about anything while under oath and what the penalties are. Sessions is an attorney, former prosecutor and now the top law enforcement officer in the United States lying under oath on national television. It's egregious. This is why 6 people or so working at the White House in January were ushered out by the FBI after working there for 3 weeks when they failed their FBI Security Clearance. The FBI Security Clearance questionnaire asks about your illegal drug usage over the past 7 years, as well as your past employment and more importantly your past and current neighbors, friends and associates. They also ask if you've ever lied under oath. As a Senator on his committee Jeff Sessions has an FBI Security Clearance.The rule is you can't lie on your Security Clearance Questionaire because this makes you a security risk . To someone unfamiliar with our government this may seem harsh or arbitrary, but it's the way government security clearances work . For most jobs it doesn't matter that you smoked pot in the past 7 years, but if you have, you can't lie about it and say you haven't. The FBI then sends out agents to question your friends, associates and employers and verify your answers.Because most people are unfamiliar with this process, the FBI agent explains all of this to you before you fill out your security clearance application . The FBI agent specifically warns you you will not be given a security clearance if you lie on your application. Yet six people in the White House last month lied on their questionnaire anyway so could not work there and were escorted out. Why do people lie like this? Because they're "not quick on their feet" ? The answer is, it doesn't matter because it was decided a very long time ago that people who lie are a security risk. And the FBI has a lot of past history which proves this true.This is why when corrupt people get done in by FBI investigations, the majority of the time it's with a charge of perjury. The FBI may not be able to find enough evidence to charge them with corruption, bribery, or some other crime - but if the FBI can prove they have lied under oath, off to prison to prison they go. Sessions met Kislyak once after the election in his Senate office, and twice before in other cities. The question was what would he do if there was any evidence that anyone in the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government during the course of this campaign, what would you do. The answer for the Attorney General is very simple, "I'll investigate if there has been any violation of US law, or I'll someone else do so. " What's incredulous is rather than answer the question , Sessions denied he had met with any representative of the Russian government during the campaign and he didn't know of anyone else who did either. Nobody one asked Jeff Sessions whether he had any contact with the Russians. He volunteered that lie himself without prompting - which is what make it so shocking. An FBI psychologist would tell you this often happens when a person feels guilty and is trying to cover-up something. - they go out of their way to lie above and beyond what is asked to try to make themselves sound honest. Regardless that this is known behavior for a guilty person, I still find it breathtaking.