Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (131365)	3/4/2017 3:03:18 PM
From: bart13	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217516

And it's not illegal to talk to them like he apparently did. Very much like it's not illegal to do what so many banksters did before and during the crisis, so Obummer didn't prosecute them.

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (131365)	3/4/2017 4:02:29 PM
From: louel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217516

Sessions denied he had met with any representative of the Russian government There is a vast difference in having a meeting with the ambassador or being at a meeting or gathering where the ambassador was also at. If the meeting was instituted by another person. Then both the Ambassador and Sessions were in fact meeting with the organizer not with each other. Should they have greeted or said hello to one and another it still does not constitute a meeting between the two. Now if the question asked was have you ever been anywhere at any time in a given time period where the Russian Ambassador was present. ? Different circumstance. But that was not the question asked.

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (131365)	3/5/2017 5:16:03 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	2 Recommendations Recommended By bart13 marcher Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217516

Elroy I fully understand your point, and agree but there is also a point of ambivalence. I do not dispute that the answer could have been much more smarter, and truthful. On the same legal aspect you bring up I am going back to my claim that a member of the FED overseeing monetary policy and financial institutions is now the top law enforcement officer in the United States was not telling all the truth or avoiding telling all the truth under oath on national television, IMHO just to gain the nomination. .... and as in your example "It's egregious." .... and he was nominated by Obama. The damage inflicted to the US treasury, not to mention UK, EU, Brazil, Australia and who knows other countries are first of all real, well beyond some mixing up of words, and the sad part the person still sits on the FED chair, involved in defining US monetary policy, and ALL the financial regulators practically know this as they have ample evidence, including the FED Ombudsman office. So much for US justice - it is discriminatory and selective and if I will disappear for good from SI chances are I was killed as they tried to electrocute me twice, send thugs to intimidate me, and threaten to kill me if I do not leave the country...... and yes the US Embassy in Tel Aviv knows about it as they have the printed evidence and as I spoke with them, as is the FBI, the FED Ombudsman office which whom I communicated but nothing was done, for the simple reason that I am the small guy who is irrelevant to most people. I could go on for hours about what is wrong even with the US system. As to Israel read this quote IDF Deputy Chief Likens 'Revolting Trends' in Israeli Society to pre-Holocaust Germany 'On Holocaust Remembrance Day, we ought to discuss our ability to uproot the seeds of intolerance, violence, self-destruction and moral deterioration,' says Maj. Gen. Yair Golan. read more: haaretz.com Israel Has Been Infected by the Seeds of Fascism, Says ex-Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Barak tells TV interviewer that 'there are no serious leaders left in the world who believe the Israeli government.' read more: haaretz.com

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (131365)	3/5/2017 4:55:45 PM
From: nicewatch	1 Recommendation Recommended By bart13 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217516

Sessions met Kislyak once after the election in his Senate office, and twice before in other cities. When exactly did Sessions meet with Kislyak after the election? I think you just invented a meeting... you better alert buzzfeed, post haste, publisher of the golden shower dossier. nytimes.com After listening to the full exchange between Franken and Sessions and reading the written question by Leahy, it's obvious that the questions added a qualifier of in Sessions capacity as Trump surrogate or part of the campaign. Sessions met in his capacity as a Senator and the first meeting was a brief hello among many ambassadors after a speech Sessions gave at the RNC. Kislyak was at the RNC at the behest of the Obama state administration along with many dozens of other ambassadors. So Sessions did not perjure himself as you so confidently claim. Speaking of which, how is that Flynn perjury case you imagined coming along these days?