SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (131595)3/7/2017 12:41:34 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217549
 
don't worry about it

try to think big

as in keeping w/ one continental economy by civilisation-state w/ history of 36% of global gdp

intent on connecting 3 continents

history is not made by small people thinking small thoughts, fearing this and dd-ing that, even keeping in mind you believe history is irrelevant



To: elmatador who wrote (131595)3/7/2017 12:49:23 AM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217549
 
What China shares in common with Japan is their demographic of a rapidly aging population resulting from the one child policy. They're running a couple of decades behind Japan in when that age bubble hits, but China's demographics are going to be more extreme. They have interesting problems to be sure.

There's still infrastructure spending in Japan, including $80 billion for the Chuo Shinkansen magnetic levitation being built between Tokyo and Nagoya, and when that's finished extended to Osaka. People just aren't certain they'll live long enough to be able to take a ride on anything other than the short test track which they queue for.

The Tokyo-Osaka trip with 9 stations will take about an hour with a top speed so far of 373 mph - the same as the flight time. That's 2.5 times faster than the 143 mph Europe's conventional ICE trains travel at and double the 200 mph TGV speed.

Although SNCF did achieve a televised TGV run at 357 mph hour on the straight between Marseilles and Lyon using a convention TGV set push well past its sensible limits.

Of course here in America we still don't have collision avoidance implemented on our rail network. And just like Spain we have one "fast train" Acella which runs at 150 mph only over a 28 mile section of track.

The rest of the trip from Boston to Washington DC is on dilapidated rails unequipped for high speed, just like Spain's AVE from Madrid to Barcelona. Hey guys, the track is an essential part of the investment.



To: elmatador who wrote (131595)3/7/2017 6:38:46 PM
From: Arran Yuan  Respond to of 217549
 
China is making the same mistake as Japan, ... ...
This idea used to flash in my mind 5 or so years ago, but it died out since then as the interconnection of Jap. with USA is completely different from that of CN and USA.



To: elmatador who wrote (131595)5/21/2017 7:42:13 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217549
 
bullish news

something about imperatives, solutions, technology, scale, history matters, etc and so forth

bloomberg.com

China's Growth Engines Are Slowly ConvergingInland provinces are catching up with the coast
May 22, 2017, 5:00 AM GMT+8



Women use mobile phones while sitting on a bench in the Gongbei district of Zhuhai, Guangdong province, China.

Photographer: Brent Lewin/BloombergGrowth in China’s economy has long centered on the coast, where Shanghai and the Pearl River Delta form some of the world’s most productive regions on their own.

But now that tide of internal migration that drew hundreds of millions of workers from the farm to factory is shifting, and lifting the economic prospects of the country’s interior.



As big-city living costs rise and job openings become less abundant, more migrants are now leaving China’s urban centers than new ones arriving, according to Oxford Economics Ltd.

"Labor costs on the East Coast are now too high for industries further down the value chain to remain competitive internationally," London-based economist Alessandro Theiss wrote in a report, citing an 8 million decline in the migrant population from 2014 to 2016.

The shift should benefit inland provinces, especially in southwest regions like Sichuan, as companies move production to take advantage of lower costs while remaining connected to coastal export hubs and industrial clusters, he said.

Southern and northwestern provinces are are likely to keep expanding relatively fast as they benefit from catch-up growth, fiscal support and geographic location, while the northeast is likely to remain the slowest-growing region as population declines and coal mining consolidates more in inland provinces, according to Theiss.

While the east coast was hit by slower global trade in recent years, conditions are now improving. Specialized manufacturing clusters and export hubs are innovating and moving up the value chain, and research activity is boosting the region.

That's good news for some of China's biggest drivers: Coastal Guangdong, Jiangsu and Shandong provinces each account for around 10 percent of national output and all had output last year that exceeded Mexico's, Theiss said. The future looks favorable for east coast provinces with more mature economies, as well as those in central China.

"They continue to innovate and to move-up the value chain, specializing in advanced manufacturing such as robotics and genomics, and expanding and developing specialized manufacturing clusters," Theiss said. "First-class infrastructure, significant R&D spending, large FDI inflows, a rapidly growing domestic market as well as a highly educated workforce should allow them to continue to grow at a solid pace."

— With assistance by Jeff Kearns



To: elmatador who wrote (131595)5/21/2017 7:58:47 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
dvdw©

  Respond to of 217549
 
better news

bullish, per scale, natural size, history, etc etc

more problems that are imperatives, and more solutions

problems are fantastic

pity those without problems or believe they have no problems

am wondering what the kibitzers mean when they intone "china over-built" - like do they have a clue of what is going on and can they imagine what is needed, per natural scale, return to the mean, history doesn't matter and and and

doubtful, dubious, suspicious, and hilarious

trust you are changing your mind? or not?

lots of years of back & forth posting left :0)

bloomberg.com

Farming the World: China’s Epic Race to Avoid a Food CrisisBy Bloomberg News May 19, 2017China’s 1.4 billion people are building up an appetite that is changing the way the world grows and sells food. The Chinese diet is becoming more like that of the average American, forcing companies to scour the planet for everything from bacon to bananas.

But China’s efforts to buy or lease agricultural land in developing nations show that building farms and ranches abroad won’t be enough. Ballooning populations in Asia, Africa and South America will add another 2 billion people within a generation and they too will need more food.

China’s Global Food Print


Food investments

Land acquisition

Food investments and land acquisition
Note: Land investments are since 2006, agriculture since 2005.

Source: The Heritage Foundation, GRAIN.org

That leaves China with a stark ultimatum: If it is to have enough affordable food for its population in the second half of this century, it will need to make sure the world grows food for 9 billion people.

Its answer is technology.

China’s agriculture industry, from the tiny rice plots tended by 70-year-old grandfathers to the giant companies that are beginning to challenge global players like Nestle SA and Danone SA, is undergoing a revolution that may be every bit as influential as the industrial transformation that rewrote global trade.

The change started four decades ago when the country began to recast its systems of production and private enterprise. Those reforms precipitated an economic boom, driven by factories, investment and exports, but the changes down on the farm were just as dramatic.

Land reforms lifted production of grains like rice and wheat, and millions joined a newly wealthy middle class that ate more vegetables and pork and wanted rare luxuries like beef and milk.

China’s Increasing Protein Consumption



Average protein supply (g/capita/day)

*Minimum recommended daily protein intake

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

When Du Chunmei was a little girl, pork was a precious gift only for the elders of her village in Sichuan during the Lunar New Year holiday. The family pig would be slaughtered, and relatives and neighbors would pack their house for a feast.

“Meat used to be such a rarity,” said Du, now 47 and an employee of state oil company PetroChina Co. whose family celebrated the holiday this year at a restaurant. “Now it’s so common we try to cut back to stay healthy.”

But the breakneck pace of the country’s development brought some nasty side effects. Tracts of prime land were swallowed by factories. Fields were polluted by waste, or by farmers soaking the soil in chemicals. The country became a byword for tainted food, from mercury-laced rice to melamine-infused milk powder.

So how can China produce enough safe food for its growing population if they all start eating like Americans?

The simple answer is it can’t.

It takes about 1 acre (half a hectare) to feed the average U.S. consumer. China only has about 0.2 acres of arable land per citizen, including fields degraded by pollution.

So China’s Communist government has increasingly shifted its focus to reforming agriculture, and its approach divides into four parts: market controls; improving farm efficiency; curbing land loss; and imports.



A bucolic scene of goatherders returning with their flock in the evening is just one part of Penglai Hesheng Agricultural Technology Development Co.’s 70,000 hectare showcase farm that is rearing local breeds of livestock and experimenting with the cultivation of dozens of types of crops.

In each case, technology is the key to balancing the food equation. The nation is spending billions on water systems, seeds, robots and data science to roll back some of the ravages of industry and develop sustainable, high-yield farms.

It needs to succeed quickly, because China’s chief tool during the past decade for boosting domestic production is backfiring.

China has a goal of being self-sufficient in staple foods like rice, corn and wheat. To ensure farmers grew those crops, it paid a minimum price for the grains and then stored the excess in government silos.

Farmers responded, saturating their small plots with fertilizers and pesticides to reap bumper crops that filled government reserves to bursting.

China’s Fertilizer Consumption



Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)

Source: The World Bank Group

Total state grain reserves were estimated to be to be more than 600 million tons last year, enough for more than a year’s supply. About half the stockpile is corn, which the government is trying to sell before it rots, forcing provinces to turn the grain into motor fuel.

“We have exhausted our resources and environment and used as much fertilizer and pesticide as possible to address supply shortages,” Han Jun, deputy director of the Office of the Central Rural Work Leading Group, wrote in the government-backed People’s Daily on Feb. 6. “We urgently need to increase production of green and good-quality agriculture products.”

But first it needs to preserve what little farmland it has.



China only has about 0.2 acres of arable land per citizen, including fields degraded by pollution. Areas like this one on the outskirts of Shanghai are becoming typical with small farmed plots being gobbled up by encroaching construction.

China lost 6.2 percent of its farmland between 1997 and 2008, according to a report by the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization and the OECD. And local governments continue to swallow fields for more-profitable real-estate developments. The Chinese Ministry of Agriculture did not respond to requests for comment on this story.

Officially, the rate of land conversion has slowed since 2007, when China announced a goal of “maintaining 1.8 billion mu of farmland” (120 million hectares). But local governments that have relied for years on land sales to fund growth can circumvent restrictions by counting marginal land as arable, or re-zoning urban areas as farms.

More alarming for the nation’s planners are reports that almost 20 percent of China’s remaining arable land is contaminated.

China’s Pollution Problem



122 million

hectares

Arable land and

Permanent crops

of China’s arable farmland

is contaminated

515 million

hectares

Citing a report issued jointly

by the Ministry of Environmental

Protection and the Ministry of

Land and Resources.

Agricultural area

960 million

hectares

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

China is shifting from building grain stockpiles to focusing on quality, efficiency and sustainable development, said Tang Renjian, a former official at the Central Rural Work Leading Group, the country’s top rural decision-making body.

Government studies in 2014 found that some vegetable plots were dosed with high levels of heavy metals such as cadmium, just one of a series of poison scares that has made the public wary of domestically produced food.

Over the years, local TV stations and social media fanned the fears, reporting a sickening array of scandals, from soy sauce produced with human hair to tofu made with sewage, and cat and rat meat passed off as rabbit and lamb.

“Chinese people are much more aware of food-safety problems today than a decade ago,” said Sam Geall, a research fellow at the U.K.’s University of Sussex who focuses on China’s environment and agriculture. “They pay more attention to where their food is coming from, and they are often willing to pay more for safety.”

Chinese-owned businesses are taking notice, seeking out overseas investments that they can turn into premium brands on supermarket shelves at home.

Ningbo chemical baron Lu Xianfeng’s Moon Lake Investments Pty bought Australia’s biggest dairy operation last year, while Wan Long’s WH Group Ltd. became the world’s largest pork producer with the purchase of Virginia-based Smithfield Foods Inc.



WH Group’s 2013 purchase of Virginia-based Smithfield was part of a $52 billion overseas spending spree by Chinese food companies since 2005 as China’s population became wary of home-produced food. This WH Group factory in Zhengzhou, China, makes American-style pork products from imported Smithfield meat.

“The Chinese consumer has grown very cynical about the safety of food from their own country,” said Sean Shwe, managing director of Moon Lake, which flies fresh milk from Tasmania to China. “The food trade into China has become very lucrative.”

A change in diet is accelerating the search for overseas supplies. Beef sales to China have risen 19,000 percent in the past decade. Imports of soybeans, used in animal feed, have grown so fast that the government quietly dropped the grain from its self-sufficiency list in 2014.

China’s Beef Imports



Volume (1,000 metric tons)

Source: United States Department of Agriculture

"China needs to import as it is unable to produce everything from its limited farmland,” said Li Xiande, a researcher with the Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, who said the country bought 106 million tons of cereals and soybeans abroad in 2016. “The country aims at self-sufficiency in staple grains and all other imports would be based on market demand.”

But China will face increasing competition from a population explosion across dozens of countries in the Southern Hemisphere.

By 2050, 14 of the world’s 20 biggest metropolises will be in Asia and Africa, with Jakarta, Manila, Karachi, Kinshasa and Lagos joining Tokyo, Shanghai and Mumbai, according to a projection by Demographia.

By then, the planet could have as many as 9.7 billion mouths to feed, according to a United Nations report. Factor in changing diets and we will need to raise global food output by 70 percent from 2009 levels, according to an FAO estimate.

The world got a taste of what might be to come a decade ago, when smaller harvests and a rapid adoption of biofuels led to a global food shock, with riots over price increases in some developing nations.



Constrained by a shortage of land and the effects of pollution, Chinese farms are adopting methods of indoor cultivation that can produce a lot of food safely in a limited space. In this Hesheng greenhouse, workers develop techniques to grow organic tomatoes.

That was one impetus behind China’s so-called land grab, where it bought or leased land in countries like Mozambique to secure grain supplies. Yet many of the projects backed by the Chinese government are aimed more at increasing production in poor countries and building China’s global influence than supplying its supermarkets.

The real effort to create another green revolution is happening back home, where entrepreneurs are embracing technology to transform the nation’s rural landscape.

China’s new breed of farmer isn’t staring at the sky to predict rain, he’s using a micro-irrigation system based on an array of soil sensors that feed data wirelessly to his smartphone. He’s growing vegetables in climate-controlled shipping containers and using drones to apply computer-formulated doses of pesticides.

Such farms are still a tiny minority, partly because of the difficulty in acquiring enough land to run an efficient operation. Beijing’s policy since 2014 has been to promote “appropriate sized” family farms of about 13 hectares or less depending on location.

Farm Size Comparisons


Less than 1 hectare

Greater than 5 hectares
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

But most Chinese farms are much smaller. China’s 260 million rural households work 120 million hectares of farmland—making the size of the average plot per rural family less than half a hectare, according to Zhong Funing, head of the International Research Centre for Food and Agricultural Economics at Nanjing Agricultural University.

New laws in November have eased the ability of companies to acquire larger tracts of land, but the government remains wary of change that would unsettle its vast rural population.

Even with a modest average farm size of 13 hectares, the country would need fewer than 10 million families working the land.

Rural Labor Input


Average plot per worker

Note: Data as of 2013. Hong Kong and Macau are not included.

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

"How can the rest of farmers find jobs in cities if they abandon the land?” Zhong said. As a result, the development of large, high-tech farms may be slow, he said.

In the meantime, China’s best option may be the same as for many developed nations—improve people’s diet.

“The demand among the middle class in China to move up the food chain is a matter of status and wealth,” said Jeremy Rifkin, author of “Beyond Beef: The Rise and Fall of the Cattle Culture.” “It’s not sustainable.”

In China, the National Health and Family Planning Commission began a campaign in 2015 to encourage citizens to cut back on meat and unhealthy foods and eat more vegetables and fruit to counter rising levels of obesity and diabetes.

The cycle has brought Du in Chengdu full circle.



Du Chunmei tends her organic farm on the roof of her husband’s factory in Chengdu after becoming disillusioned with the quality of supermarket food. “Being able to plant your own food is a luxury. You need to find space.”

Now her family again buys a pig each year, but not for the New Year feast. She does it to be sure of what the animal ate, insisting the farmer feeds it only corn and vegetables for eight months before slaughter.

With the help of her 75-year-old mother, Du grows peppers, cabbage, eggplants and pumpkins on the roof of her husband’s factory. Some two dozen chickens and ducks share the space, pecking on organic feed.

“There’s so much pesticides, pollutants and fertilizer in the food sold in supermarkets,” Du said. “Being able to grow your own food is a luxury.”



To: elmatador who wrote (131595)5/23/2017 5:49:26 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217549
 
try

try once more

again

because the pain is exquisite and anguish refreshing, per scale is everything

ad infinitum ad naseum

once every 800 years per history does not matter

but try they must, natural size and all

as moths drawn to open flame

bloomberg.com

Hedge Fund Plummets 62% After Betting Against the Chinese Economy
More stories by Melissa KarshMay 23, 2017, 11:00 PM GMT+8
A hedge fund at Emerging Sovereign Group that has bet against the Chinese economy sunk about 62 percent this year through April.

The Nexus fund dropped 8.2 percent last month, according to an email to investors seen by Bloomberg News. The April results mark at least the third consecutive month of negative returns for the fund.

China bears have suffered as economic growth accelerated in the first quarter and officials have been guiding the yuan higher against the dollar in a move that’s caught market watchers by surprise. The Nexus fund gained 35 percent in 2015, profiting from moves by China’s central bank to devalue the yuan by the most since 1994. But the fund has underpeformed since 2016 when it dropped 15.5 percent, Bloomberg has reported.

ESG is run by co-founders Kevin Kenny, Mete Tuncel and Jason Kirschner, who bought out Carlyle Group LP’s 55 percent stake and took full control of the firm in October. Most of the assets at ESG, which managed $3.5 billion as of December, are in two of its other funds.

A spokesman for New York-based ESG, which started in 2002 with seed capital from Julian Robertson’s Tiger Management, declined to comment.

Puerto Rico Winner

Your cheat sheet on life, in one weekly email.
Get our weekly Game Plan newsletter.

Candlewood Investment Group’s Puerto Rico SP fund gained 5.7 percent in the first two weeks of May, bringing year-to-date returns to 9.4 percent, according to an investor update seen by Bloomberg. The $105 million fund targets securities including general-obligation bonds, or GOs, and other opportunistic areas within the Puerto Rico municipal bond market. Puerto Rico declared a form of bankruptcy in May.

"There have been several recent events which we believe confirm our investment positioning and thesis," the $1.2 billion firm said in a separate letter for April. "The most notable was the Commonwealth’s restructuring proposal which clearly prioritized GO and GO guaranteed debt above other bondholders."

Michael Ardisson, partner and director of business development at Candlewood, declined to comment.

Millennium UnderwhelmsMillennium Management’s main fund has been posting middling results this year along with its multistrategy peers. The Millennium International fund returned 0.3 percent in April to bring returns for the first four months of the year to an estimated 2.5 percent, according to an investor update seen by Bloomberg.

Hedge Fund Research Inc.’s multistrategy index rose about 2 percent in that time, as did hedge funds on average.

The largest driver of the Millennium fund’s performance last month was the relative value fundamental equity strategy, which gained 0.2 percent on the strength of the technology, financials and health-care sectors, the update shows. A spokeswoman for the $35 billion firm run by Izzy Englander declined to comment.



To: elmatador who wrote (131595)5/24/2017 11:07:16 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217549
 
the more the merrier

interconnectedness is nation-agnostic as long as in the neighbourhood to serve the neighbourhood, and teams japan and usa shall soon enough discover

economictimes.indiatimes.com

US revives two infra projects in Asia to counter China's OBOR

PTI | May 24, 2017, 01.36 PM IST

WASHINGTON: The US has revived two major infrastructure projects in South and Southeast Asia in which India would be a vital player, a move that could potentially act as a counter to China's ambitious Belt and Road initiative.

The Trump administration has resuscitated the 'New Silk Road' initiative, first announced by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in July 2011 in a speech in Chennai, and the Indo-Pacific Economic Corridor linking South and Southeast Asia.

A brief outline of the two projects was made available in the administration's maiden annual budget yesterday, which indicated that the 'New Silk Road' project would be a public- private initiative in which India would be an important player.

The state department said the budgetary request of its South and Central Asia will support the two initiatives: the New Silk Road (NSR) focused on Afghanistan and its neighbours, and the Indo-Pacific Economic Corridor linking South Asia with Southeast Asia.

This request will be leveraged through side-by-side collaboration with regional countries, other bilateral donors, multilateral development banks, and the private sector.

It said "the importance of...the NSR grows" as the transition in Afghanistan continues and the US "strives to help the Afghan people succeed and stand on their own."

The state department said it will deepen support for the objectives through "far-reaching" public diplomacy programmes.

According to James McBride of the Council on Foreign Relations, the NSR refers to a suite of joint investment projects and regional trade blocs that have the potential to bring economic growth and stability to Central Asia.

"Following the surge of 30,000 additional troops into Afghanistan in 2009, which President Barack Obama's administration had hoped would lay the groundwork for complete withdrawal a few years later, Washington began to lay out a strategy for supporting these initiatives through diplomatic means," McBride said.

Announcing her vision for a New Silk Road, Clinton had said in Chennai: "Turkmen gas fields could help meet both Pakistan's and India's growing energy needs and provide significant transit revenues for both Afghanistan and Pakistan. Tajik cotton could be turned into Indian linens. Furniture and fruit from Afghanistan could find its way to the markets of Astana or Mumbai and beyond."

But the NSR strategy took a back seat during Obama's second term when John Kerry occupied the Foggy Bottom headquarters of the state department.

Simon Denyer, the China bureau chief of The Washington Post, recently wrote that Clinton's idea never really got off the ground, and the Obama administration was criticised by experts for responding negatively to China-backed The New Development Bank.

Through the B&R initiative, China aims to link itself with markets in Europe and Africa through Asian countries and the Indian Ocean. India opposes one of the projects under the initiative as it runs through Gilgit and Baltistan in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

The USD 46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor links China's restive Xinjiang region to the southern Pakistani port Gwadar, built with Chinese funding. The port could potentially be used as a naval outpost for the Chinese military.



To: elmatador who wrote (131595)5/28/2017 11:54:16 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217549
 
for the history-doesn't-matter devotees, perhaps it doesn't

it may be that bloomberg is overly pessimistic re <<But it will take a generation or more before Brazil’s future finally overpowers its history, before the ghost of Dom Pedro is finally exorcised from the country.>> as that which doesn't matter ought to be overcome w/i less than a generation or so

time shall tell

bloomberg.com

Brazil’s Car Wash Scandal Reveals a Country Soaked in CorruptionWhat may be the largest corruption case in modern history runs deep in Latin America’s largest country.
More stories by Tim PadgettMay 26, 2017, 12:24 AM GMT+8

In U.S. history, entire cities and states have been branded corrupt: Think Richard J. Daley’s Chicago or Huey Long’s Louisiana. But amid even the worst federal scandals, Watergate included, the country has never been nationally profiled as crooked—a venal society from coast to coast, from dogcatcher to commander-in-chief.

Brazil feels that way right now, largely the result of a bribery scandal of Amazonian proportions known in Portuguese as Lava Jato, or Operation Car Wash, believed to be the largest corruption case in modern history. The multibillion-dollar tsunami of sleaze barreling through Latin America’s largest country and economy is deeper and broader than any Trump-Russia allegations pouring out of Washington. And it could force the resignation of Brazilian President Michel Temer, who’s been fingered repeatedly in recent weeks for allegedly orchestrating and receiving millions of dollars in bribes.

The 76-year-old conservative denies the accusations—his lawyer, laughably, says Temer is too old to have to answer them—but he’s not the only Brazilian president under the interrogation lamp. His predecessor, Dilma Rousseff, who was impeached and removed from office last year, and her predecessor and mentor, Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva, are also alleged to have received tens of millions of dollars in graft.

They, too, deny it—but it hardly stops with them. Eight of Temer’s cabinet ministers are under investigation. So are powerful senators such as Aécio Neves, who narrowly lost the 2014 presidential election. The head of Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies, Eduardo da Cunha—who was shameless enough to hide some of the $40 million in bribes he pocketed in a religious shell company called Jesus.com—was convicted in March and sentenced to 15 years in prison. He has appealed the verdict.

Most Brazilians hope Lava Jato will be a crossroads for change. But sadly, that’s been said of most Brazilian scandals

Hundreds more legislators, governors, mayors, political bosses, and business executives are caught up in Lava Jato (named for a Brasília gas station where some of the payoff cash was laundered). They’re part of an epic network of bribes, kickbacks, hush money, and money laundering focused mainly on Brazil’s state-run oil company, Petrobras. Its executives, as well as such politicians as da Cunha, took bribes from businesses in exchange for greatly inflated Petrobras work contracts.

Since the scheme was detected three years ago, prosecutors have yet to reach bottom in their investigation—and the total sum of payoffs may exceed $5 billion. The criminality may also cost Petrobras, South America’s largest corporation, $13 billion in contract losses and legal settlements, and it’s already resulted in the layoff of thousands of Petrobras workers. Meanwhile, Odebrecht, the Brazilian construction giant that led the bribery bacchanal, is a disgraced and crumbling conglomerate. Its boss, Marcelo Odebrecht, was sentenced last year to 19 years in prison. He’s now a key witness and negotiating a lighter sentence. “This is a tense moment in our history,” Sérgio Moro, the federal judge heading the Lava Jato prosecution, said recently. “It is a crossroads.”

Moro and most Brazilians hope Lava Jato will be a crossroads for change. But sadly, that’s been said of most Brazilian scandals—which were then followed by even bigger ones. The 1992 corruption impeachment of President Fernando Collor de Mello for influence peddling was supposedly such a crossroads. But a decade later, during Lula’s presidency, came the Mensalão scandal, in which Lula’s Workers’ Party paid deputies and senators $50 million to sway legislation.

Mensalão should have been a turning point, too, especially since Lula’s chief of staff, José Dirceu, was sentenced to 32 years for his involvement—perhaps the first time in Brazil’s history that a high-ranking crooked official heard a cell door close behind him. (Dirceu is appealing the sentence.) But then came Lava Jato, as well as last year’s $2.5 billion federal pension fund scandal and the financial chicanery that tainted Brazil’s 2014 FIFA World Cup and Rio de Janeiro’s 2016 Summer Olympics.

And did I mention the just-as-appalling rot at state and local levels? Many lower-ranking public servants enjoy what Brazilians call O Trem da Alegria—the Joy Train—an embezzlement locomotive that can make overnight millionaires out of backwater bureaucrats such as Lidiane Leite.

When Leite became mayor of the northeastern town of Bom Jardim in 2012, she put the Joy Train in high gear. She gave herself an astronomical raise, bought a Toyota SUV, went on lavish shopping sprees, and attended Champagne parties, bragging about it on social media. Investigators say she pilfered as much as $4 million—a big reason kids in Bom Jardim went without school lunches. After being jailed briefly in 2016, Leite was convicted this year. But her sentence included only a fine and suspension from political activity, not prison time.

Cases like Leite’s are common in Brazil. I once interviewed a small-town mayor in Rio de Janeiro state who rode the Joy Train to make $264,000 a year—then twice the salary of Brazil’s president. Those minor league outrages help explain why major league catastrophes such as Lava Jato never become meaningful crossroads for Brazil’s 208 million people. It’s because corruption is the road in Brazil—a default path that experts estimate costs the country as much as 5 percent of its $2 trillion gross domestic product every year.

“When you think you’re headed to a different Brazil,” says Brazilian-born writer Juliana Barbassa, who investigated questionable spending for the Rio Olympiad, “you usually end up in the same Brazil.”

To understand why, you have to reach back two centuries, to when the country was a monarchy. In 1807, Napoleon’s Iberian invasion forced the Portuguese royal court into exile in Brazil, its colony at the time. The king returned to Lisbon in 1821. But when Brazilians declared independence a year later, they made his son who’d stayed behind their head of state: Emperor Dom Pedro I.

Brazil’s royal rule lasted until 1889. It helped Brazil avoid the civil warfare that plagued fledgling republics such as next-door Venezuela. But it also meant that for its first 67 years, the nation lived under a courtly system based less on public institutions than on personal favors. That bred three cancers, which, while widespread in Latin America, seem most malignant in Brazil.

The first is an incestuous relationship between business and a government run by a chaotic array of political parties. When Brazil became a republic, the palms to be greased now belonged to deputies in congress instead of dukes in castles. Public ethics rarely if ever took root because graft continued to be the accepted public ethos. Lava Jato is simply the latest, largest tumor to grow from that reality. Executives at the meatpacking company JBS SA tell Brazil’s high court that the multimillion-dollar bribes they paid Planalto, the Brasília presidential palace, got them dirt-cheap loans from the state development bank JBS might not have been eligible for otherwise.

The second is staggering economic inequality. The monarchy created a caste structure (Brazil was the last country in the Americas to abolish slavery, in 1888) that kept wealth locked in the hands of the elites who were paying and receiving all those bribes and kickbacks. That squalid arrangement still exists—and it’s a big reason a recent University of Brasília study shows less than 1 percent of Brazil’s population still owns almost half its GDP.

And third, a monstrously bloated bureaucracy. The parasitic royal courtiers of Brazil’s 19th century morphed into the parasitic civil servants of its 20th. And, like Leite, they’re alive and well in the 21st, cadging outrageously inordinate salaries and pensions that drain two-thirds of all public revenue. Yet their performance hardly reflects their pay: In Brazil it takes four months of red tape just to get approval to start a business.

Granted, Moro’s aggressive Lava Jato prosecution spawns hope that at least the serial impunity associated with Brazilian corruption might be ending. Ironically, the legacies of the most recent presidents are also encouraging: Lula put a dent in inequality, bringing some 40 million Brazilians into the middle class; Rousseff ordered the first real anticorruption campaign; Temer’s legislative agenda is a bureaucracy buster.

But it will take a generation or more before Brazil’s future finally overpowers its history, before the ghost of Dom Pedro is finally exorcised from the country.