Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (16199)	4/5/2017 4:16:41 PM
From: the Chief	1 Recommendation Recommended By hoperrs Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Not knit pickin, but CCB is not part of their action. They are challenging MRC and GSLR which I find by most descriptors futile. Why? Its easy, and if their lawyer had HALF a brain he/she would explain to Mudslide that he will not win. Now there is no stopping a person who stands on ceremony where, "I fought da Law and da Law won, but at least I fought", theory! So if he is doing it to be seen as a big wheel in town, then go for it. Here is why he will lose. From everything I have read the MRC and GSLR proclamations or preponderances occurred in 2015. So in 2015 they sat around the Council Tables deciding grandiose plans for Grenville area. They suggested green spaces, Rec areas and a Park. But what NONE of them appeared to have done was determine whether their were "existing claims" against the area!! So MRC and GSLR both pondered the park/rec area but they really never went beyond pondering it. Had they done so they would have found that the claims for property which they could have secured the same way CCB did, were already taken and the Park/Rec area would have died a natural death. You see, when you decide a Park or Rec area, you have to follow it up IN LAW with a claim title to the property. Once you have and own that claim, you can then say, "we own the sub-surface rights, we own the surface rights, therefore, we rezone to Park and Rec. OR, if no claims against the properties, and its crown land then you inform the crown you would like to rezone. But in both cases the first thing you do, is to check "CLAIMS". Thats the part that MudSlide (luv that name) is missing. So AT NO TIME during the ponderance, the proclamation and the Planning did anyone say..."GEE I wonder if anyone has a legal access that predates our ponderance??? So Le Gris and the rest of the signees of the Superior Court Challenge are going after those that signed and "gave away their Park and Rec area." (NOT THE MINE AND NOT THE QUARRY AND NOT Canada Carbon) Once their lawyer relieves them of enough money, he/she may then stumble upon whom was their first and tell these people that MRC and GSLR had no choice. The Park and Rec area were NEVER going to happen, unless CCB decided it was. Now I am not gloating that we won this thing, because we were always destined to win it. Grandfathering is grandfathering. But if Legris wants to sue his own Municipality and County that's up to him, after all he is Mr Popular so I understand, already, but it does not stop the process. PERIOD. Now the Park and Rec area may occur but the more they appear to interfere with due process the less CCB becomes amiable too cooperate with the Grenville/MRC. Companies can do alot for communities by funneling money back into the local and region, keep slapping them in the face for FOLLOWING THE LAW and things could change. Thats not some sort of warning, I know if I was running Canada Carbon and a group was going around bad mouthing me, the next time I see them in a bar, I would not be buying a round for them....same things happen at bigger dollar values. Some of these people that signed up with Le Gris should do their own Due Dilligence because if they are relying on Mudslide, they will slip with him.