Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cautious_Optimist who wrote (334038)	4/18/2017 12:26:52 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542147

My kids tell me that Stein appealed to many of their naïve friends. The kids who did not like Clinton, or were angry about Bernie losing. They are kids and dumb by definition-lol. . There were also a lot of pot smokers that voted for Johnson, not understanding the stakes. And many just too lazy to vote, or simply did not see the stakes at hand. But there were also a lot of liberals, that are very intelligent that still did not understand the stakes and voted for Stein. I had three of my best friends get real mad at me for just supporting Clinton and two of them walked out of a dinner party when I simply said we need to get Hillary elected. In fact there were a couple people on this thread that got mad at me for simply saying that we needed to reel in the third-party candidates and everyone needed to vote for Hillary. Too many people on the left were so sure that Hillary would win anyway that they took this election for granted. They simply made a mistake in understanding the stakes at risk. I posted over and over that it was all hands on deck and we had to all get behind Hillary 100%. And many people (my fiends included) who just couldn't see what an airhead Stein and Johnson are, or the consequences of staying at home. All three still defend Nader. The human condition.