SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael d kugler who wrote (33903)1/6/1998 6:49:00 PM
From: campe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Wow, this last round goes to Kugler. Came out with a one two punch and followed up with a bunch of steady jabs.

See Pugs, I've learned something from this thread. And BTW - even play sparring with tonto can get you hurt.

'nite all - hasta man~ana



To: michael d kugler who wrote (33903)1/6/1998 6:52:00 PM
From: s martin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
Here's his explanation for that from last night.. I guess his claim is there are several "sets" of 4 mill shares. <G>

To: +Michael P. Weber (33638 )
From: +s martin Tuesday, Jan 6 1998 12:52AM EST
Reply # of 33902

>>>There's nothing to debate here....No company in their right mind would give up what they legally own....Your WRONG for implying that they would. You in fact no nothing at all...and are showing your ignorance here! <<<<

I think you are right.. PRTI legally owned the shares of MVPH and they wouldn't "give " them to RMCW just because RMCW "claimed" they were damaged. It would take a court decision to determine ownership if they don't agree. The MVPH shares have been distributed to the PRTI shareholders haven't they?

To: +s martin (33649 )
From: +Michael P. Weber Tuesday, Jan 6 1998 1:04AM EST
Reply # of 33901

S. Martin,

Wrong again! MVPH did distribute 4 mil shares to PRTI stockholders but they aren't the same shares.

Per PRTI's Attorney on 1/5/98 - PRTI assigned the 4 mil shares of MVPH to RMCW because they claimed in essence 15Mil in damages. <EOD>



To: michael d kugler who wrote (33903)1/6/1998 10:33:00 PM
From: Michael P. Weber  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Michael,

Boy this sure sounds like the pot calling the kettle black!

Your wrong as usual and I'm not apologizing for anything! I have not mislead shareholders! Unlike you I'm looking out for RMIL longs and the company from you BASHING it here on this thread.

I'm still waiting for your apology!

Mike