Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1013464)	4/26/2017 2:51:46 PM
From: POKERSAM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578127

"Then you should like cleaning the air of our CO2 and CH4." That really is not a concern to me. I an not an idiot who is always looking for the next cause to hook my wagon to. I think you people have such a shallow existence that you need a cause. The bigger the cause the better you like it. What could be a larger cause than saving mother earth and heading off mankind's extinction? Since I do not need it for my cause for living, I am free to judge it based on the facts. You clowns need it so bad you will swallow any lie that supports it and refuse any truth that is contrary. That is called confirmation bias.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1013464)	4/26/2017 7:44:25 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	3 Recommendations Recommended By i-node PKRBKR POKERSAM Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578127

Wharfie, Then you should like cleaning the air of our CO2 and CH4. CO2 is not responsible for the smog you see in Beijing every day. CO2 is not responsible for the smog you see in southern California every afternoon during rush hour. CO2 is not responsible for emphysema and all the other respiratory illnesses associated with air pollution. CO2 is not a factor in the daily Air Quality Index we get from the meteorologist every day. Bottom line is that CO2 is not a pollutant like CO or O3 is. Tenchusatsu