SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Yegerlehner who wrote (3546)1/7/1998 12:26:00 AM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 6843
 
These are reasonable concerns that will be addressed in due time, but let them have their time to be proud, they've waited a long time.

EP



To: James Yegerlehner who wrote (3546)1/7/1998 12:43:00 AM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Respond to of 6843
 
Your first point is correct (chips fabbed at SDC) but your second is incorrect (.25 starts at 233 mhz). Only the notebook version of the chip runs at 233mhz; the desktop version runs at 266.



To: James Yegerlehner who wrote (3546)1/7/1998 12:46:00 AM
From: Robert Walter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6843
 
James,

I agree it would be nice to see the 0.25 micron K6's at higher speeds but the real question is what voltage does the K6-266 need to run and what wattage is the out put?

Robert



To: James Yegerlehner who wrote (3546)1/7/1998 2:00:00 AM
From: Adrian Wu  Respond to of 6843
 
James,

A previous article in November, right after the announcement of the yield problem and the Dham resignation, did say that AMD was putting all their R&D efforts onto correcting the yield problem and moving to 0.25 micron. However, even Fab 25 should be 0.25 by the middle of the year.

The decision to move to 0.25 is strictly a cost issue. The 0.25 micron K6 will only be 88 sq. mm in die size, which is smaller than even the Pentiums, since it uses a 5-metal layer CMOS process, vs. Intel's 4. Smaller line width also makes the K6 suitable for mobile, thus leapfrogging Intel. Intel could afford to charge $700+ for the PII300, hence the 0.35 line width, but they would have to wait for the Deschutes to get the PII into notebooks.

Adrian

Adrian



To: James Yegerlehner who wrote (3546)1/7/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6843
 
James re:<The first 0.25 micron K6's start at 233 MHz> is "fishy"???

The first 0.25 micron K6 MOBILES start at 233MHz. Intel's first 0.25 micron Pentium mobile started at 200 MHz, and their fastest 0.25 micron chip is still only 233 MHz

Petz