Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff S. who wrote (1888)	1/7/1998 10:15:00 AM
From: J. M. Burr	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

JAS: It is my sincere hope that this baby does not take the plunge because I'm in up to my nose. That being said, I complain, as I have in the past, that this company cares very little for shareholders concerns. Here we are in the New Year and we have no word from Henderson. Why? Is it too much to ask that the doofi (plural of doofus) running this show might prove that they do know how to use the English language and offer us duffers some view of future events? Tumbleweed.

To: Jeff S. who wrote (1888)	1/8/1998 12:10:00 AM
From: FMK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Jeff and Tackman, It's good to know that others concur with the point I was trying to make. It makes sense that VLNC's unit cost should lessen with larger automated production volumes and in-house lamination plant. Also relevant, of course, are the extremely low NI tax rate and the Gov't rebate once production gets underway. I chose to limit the comparison to production capacity alone for clarity. You chose an excellent time for mentioning these other factors! Thanks and Regards, FMK