Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Winn who wrote (8532)	1/7/1998 2:24:00 PM
From: Steve Woas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Mike, It is obvious that you don't have a clue as to what constitutes a Y2K problem. Your DD is a joke. The company that you claim to have worked for has no record of you. Why not try to find a thread were such qualities are in demand instead of taking up valuable band width here? Steve

To: Mike Winn who wrote (8532)	1/7/1998 7:38:00 PM
From: Hardrocker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Mike, <Don't you think that IBD did not include TPRO in their Y2K article for good reasons.> I have stayed out of the fray, first amused at the debate and then bored by it. I have no desire to banter silly issues with you, Mike. To answer your un-question-marked question, of course there is good reason. The reason is that TPRO has not yet been discovered by the street, a virtual unknown in a field which is little understood. That will change dramatically over the next few months, I feel certain of it. Why do you insist on the continuance of harping these issues? You say you are neither long nor short TPRO, so why not just drop it? If you are trying to save me from myself, then thanks for trying. And that is sincere, no sarcasm intended. But now you have stated your position and I respectfully disagree, so time will decide who is right and who is wrong. But the debate helps no one at this point. Hardrocker