Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1024335)	7/11/2017 4:47:37 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 1573216

"It's just as useless as saying, "Well I want guns out of the hands of terrorists, criminals, and the mentally unstable." Fine, but how do you get there?" As long as you frame it that way, just cut off their hands.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1024335)	7/11/2017 9:27:12 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573216

I don't. They're tools for terrorists and pedophiles. The Constitution protects the public's papers, etc only against unreasonable searches and those without warrants based on probable cause. The founding fathers didn't use absolute language in the 4th amendment and they didn't foresee or want criminals and spies to be protected from searches. Exceptions were left for law enforcement and public safety. Why second guess these wise men? Amendment IVThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The Second Amendment is actually stronger worded. And even there we allow convicts to lose the right even though that isn't in the 2A wording.