Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (29663)	1/7/1998 9:13:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

C L just sent me the following message: Subject: Did you get paid? Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 20:54:24 -0500 From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org> To: milt069@concentric.net Matt = C.L. = Frank You might find this interesting. biz.yahoo.com I suggest you read it. ------------------------------------------------------ This is from that scum-bag Coggins and I am forwarding it to IPM's attornies, along with all of the rest of the garbage that he sends out. Mason -- you are really screwing up -- no one is invisible and a court order will grab you when this all comes to court. You are unbelievably stupid.

To: go4it who wrote (29663)	1/7/1998 10:01:00 PM
From: O. H. Rundell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Did they only release those of the AA ? So it would seem, Chuck; but as usual, it is difficult to be certain. What they should have released (IMHO) is the results of each type of test to show the consistency. Still, I'm trying to understand why they're fooling with wet chemistry when they have a fire assay. The wet chemistry/AA stuff was done a couple of years ago. Can it be the fire assay isn't working, after all? [It has been my observation that when the claims of one PR become (how do I say this)...become "inoperative" (?), subsequent PRs simply ignore the now inoperative prior claims.] Can it be that we now find that we don't need a fire assay, after all? O. H.