Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : ACMI - Accumed Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cisco who wrote (1014)	1/8/1998 12:21:00 PM
From: joemjo	Respond to of 1894

Cisco, You are still asleep. Only your nightmare has turned into a much more enjoyable dream. Just looking back here I would like to note something which is obvious. ACMI traded below 2 for the first time last year on 10-28. It then bounced around 2 untill 11-24 when it then stayed below. That took two months to hit 1. It has retraced those two months this past week. I am trying to convince myself to be patient and settle for this current price. I am also very tempted to add and play the momentum. Todd

To: Cisco who wrote (1014)	1/8/1998 2:47:00 PM
From: Cisco	Respond to of 1894

To all readers of this thread: I received an e-mail mail today from an investment broker at A.G. Edwards implying I have not done "due diligence and was spreading false information that is taken as true about him and his company. He has requested that if his name or company is in print that all the facts be 100% accurate. Further, he has requested that I write and post a rebuttal letter on SI. The post in question is the following: techstocks.com First, he stated: I, however, have never been, nor will be involved with the armed services. Hence, my screen name is not go Airborne. In response, I would like to say that I posted that the information ...may be from a broker at A.G. Edwards. I did not post that goAirborne was a broker from A.G. Edwards. In fact, in the immediate preceding post I provided a link in which goAirborne identified himself as a manager in the GM Service Operation in Detroit. messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com Second, did I do due diligence before suggesting a connection between goAirborne and A.G. Edwards? Absolutely! The connection to A.G. Edwards came directly from goAirborne himself and not me! messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com In addition, part of the information that goAirborne was touting (ie. break even by 2nd quarter) is information that I know for a fact was given to two members of this thread by a broker at A.G. Edwards. Also, a member of this thread asked goAirborne to identify his sources to which he refused! messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com Third, was it improper to wonder out loud if goAirborne got his information from the same A.G. Edwards broker who was on the conference call? I will let you be the judge! First, I reviewed the public record for any connection between A.G. Edwards and AccuMed. The only connection I could find was the A.G. Edward's broker on the conference call. In addition, I noted that he was the only broker or analyst referred to by their first name by management. Second, I knew the broker followed the Yahoo thread and occasionally posted on Yahoo. Third, I knew for a fact that he occasionally e-mailed individuals who posted on the internet about AccuMed. I also noted that in today's e-mail he denied being goAirborne, but never denied any of the information goAirborne was distributing. As to me writing a rebuttal letter, that is not my place. I have invited him in the past to post directly on this thread but he has chosen to post only on Yahoo. If he wants to e-mail a rebuttal letter to me, I will be glad to post it for him on this thread! As long as I am invested in this company, I will continue to ask tough questions from time to time. I don't mind if a person hypes or trashes a stock as long as they cite their reasons. I reserve the right to always challenge a poster who claims sources inside the company who screams buy, buy, buy and you can retire but refuses to give their sources! messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com Cisco