SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1034508)10/20/2017 4:05:07 PM
From: Heywood402 Recommendations

Recommended By
Jeff Hayden
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574746
 
There's a reason nobody who likes the percentage comparisons wants to look at the actual numbers.

If the top 1% own 40% of wealth, the other 99% owns 60%.

That means for every $1 one of the lower 99% has, one of the top 1% has $60.60. (of each $1000, 1% has $400, 99% share the remaining $600, at $60.60 each)

So, an individual with 66 times more money is paying 70.6% of the taxes.

Sounds about right to me, considering money earned to pay the basic costs of food, clothing, medical care and shelter should be taxed at a much lower rate than money earned to pay the costs of yachts, Gulfstreams, Maseratis, country club memberships, caviar and the gold-plating of room decor.

Do you disagree?



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1034508)10/20/2017 4:09:11 PM
From: Taro3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Broken_Clock
locogringo
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574746
 
Ten,

you are wasting your time arguing with those libs. Does not matter whatever real data you display right there on the wall in front of them, their built-in reality filter making sure the message never making it to their brains, even if they have some of that or just vacuum, where it should be situated.