Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Heywood40 who wrote (1034567)	10/20/2017 4:30:26 PM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574854

Do you disagree? Yes. Why does Schumer need a state income tax deduction? Does John'F'n Kerry get one too? Is there a deduction for flag burners and crybabies?

To: Heywood40 who wrote (1034567)	10/20/2017 6:07:19 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574854

Heywood, So, an individual with 66 times more money is paying 70.6% of the taxes. Your math is wrong, your numbers are wrong, and your comparison above is invalid. Why don't you go back to your original question? About 1.7 million Americans, less than 1 percent of our population, earn ____ percent of all income, and pay 70.6 percent of federal income taxes. ... What number goes in the blank? The number that goes into that blank is less than 20. This is based on the following graph: cepr.net The income share of the top 1% has never exceeded 20%, and you're asking for a number that correlates to LESS than 1% of the population. So your quote should be the following: About 1.7 million Americans, less than 1 percent of our population, earn less than 20 percent of all income, and pay 70.6 percent of federal income taxes. Tenchusatsu