Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rdkflorida2 who wrote (5143)	10/23/2017 1:01:54 PM
From: berniel	Respond to of 26838

Been doing that for the last 20 years. Along with ngl"s. Still think water flood is the best way. Abundance of seawater and emptied reservoirs to dispose in. cost is pipeline and pumps. Which many aging fields have in place.

To: rdkflorida2 who wrote (5143)	10/23/2017 1:47:30 PM
From: Kirk ©	1 Recommendation Recommended By Investor Clouseau Respond to of 26838

I have to chuckle and say that sounds like Al Gore justifying flying around in a private jet and living in a huge mansion with high heat and AC needs telling me to not use carbon based energy. Also, there is this. Using captured CO2 to inject into existing oil wells for additional recovery of oil not able to be extracted under "normal" conditions. Helpful but still fossil fuel dependent. It does help us move towards energy independence. RD Also reminds me of Obama forcing his health care on everyone who wasn't in a union so they can still have caddy plans and not pay the "tax" to help pay for ACA...