Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (44247)	11/9/2017 11:50:38 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 365531

>> There are very few scientists who think the way you do There were very few scientists who thought the way Einstein did. But there are great scientists who disagree with Warmism. Real scientists. This is how the process works. Look how long it took for physicists to come to terms with wave-particle duality. The arguments civilized, they were not carried out in the newspapers so much, but they were rigorous and reasonable. During Einstein's Annus Mirabilis, he got no respect for much of what we wrote about. Practically no one gave a damn about his findings on Brownian Motion before 1920. In the case of climate, the time scale is dragged out much wider, not over decades, but over centuries. The idea that some thirty-year period is going to provide a meaningful look at where the climate is or where it is going is ridiculous. Unfortunately, today's "climate science" is the "hurry up" brand of science you would expect from people who lead throw-away lives more focused on the result than a quality process.