Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (35400)	1/10/1998 4:39:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs: I don't recall MK asking people to consider his professional experience prior to their making decisions regarding this or another stock. TG

To: Pugs who wrote (35400)	1/10/1998 4:53:00 PM
From: michael d kugler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

I've put out what the company hasn't told you and you want to sue me? And Principal has absolutely nothing to do with this issue. Interesting that you don't seem the least upset with RMIL, despite the fact the SEC has said RMIL has lied to you. Perhaps, then, the lies and hype you have put out here should be looked at a bit more closely within the context of shareholders' losses here.

To: Pugs who wrote (35400)	1/10/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: H Peterson	Respond to of 55532

Pugs, With all due respect, I shouldn't be on your list. All I did was ask you a few questions about the law suit. I haven't made a decision on rather to join or not. I think whoever joins should be a private matter and their names should not be disclosed. Thanks, I meant no disrespect.

To: Pugs who wrote (35400)	1/10/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 55532

who appealed to investors and lurkers to consider his "professional experience" when making your investment decisions Is this what you're basing this on? That he started a sentence in a post with "In my professional experience"? This is ill-conceived, foolish, and malicious. Even for you! It smacks of desperation. If this thing tanks, despite your having spent in excess of 12 hours a day hyping it, should the people who bought in sue you? In fact, comparing the high with the price at the halt, people have already been damaged. Isn't it arguable that they are damaged because they bought at too high a price because of your advice?