Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael P. Weber who wrote (35690)	1/11/1998 4:59:00 PM
From: Ditchdigger	Respond to of 55532

Michael,please check out this posters profile,and notice the business he's in, Do you want to take his rights away as well?..DD 207.183.153.33 Perhaps Mike K. should post through you,so as you can screen,censor,repress, his posts and his right to his opinion..

To: Michael P. Weber who wrote (35690)	1/11/1998 5:12:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Your posts today have been just chock full of what people can and cannot do when posting. All day long you have yammered about what, why, when and how people can post. Are you an employee of some internet regulatory body that gives you some special dispensation to make these calls?

To: Michael P. Weber who wrote (35690)	1/11/1998 5:32:00 PM
From: FTJoe	Respond to of 55532

I know what you mean, and I agree with you that I would be out of here in a heart beat. Unfortunately, that's a testament to my cowardice. Because I think he's not involved in this for any other reason than beliefs, I have to give him credit(perhaps some think it's stupid) for sticking it out. If you've read my past posts, you know I believe there are many posts of his that leave a lot to be desired(an understatement). If you think about it, if he were really here protecting the interest of shorts, he would have taken a psuedonym a long time ago and posted under that. My contention about the suit is, it's not warranted soley on the basis of him being a broker, that's an excuse to file the suit and stop him from posting. I did agree that I think it's unfair and perhaps irresponsible for him to post. In retrospect, that opinion is probably based more on his style than the fact he's a broker. I'm still waiting to see if Pugs intends on suing if he gets a response from the employer and the response is they won't stop Michael from posting. If the suit continues in that situation then I will be even more damant about trying to stop it. That's a lousy excuse/loophole to try and stop someone from posting. If everyone remembers correctly, many of my past posts have been pleas to Michael to tone it down, he has not and maybe many people think he deserves this. I don't.