Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1050638)	1/25/2018 5:15:23 PM
From: Bonefish	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575761

I think we need to see the dossier. As silly as that may seem to you. Remember, Hillary thought she was 100 to 1 for the win. The dossier is but a manufacteted grudge.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1050638)	1/26/2018 7:12:24 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575761

Brumar, Why didn't Hillary talk about the dossier before the election? Why wasn't it released? These were questions I asked in the past, back when it was revealed that Hillary funded the dossier. The answer I got was that Hillary's campaign leaked details of the dossier to the media, thereby creating "fake news." They didn't go public with the dossier for fear of a backlash, but instead they just worked it behind the scenes. Another thing that happened was that the dossier led the FBI to take certain actions that they otherwise wouldn't have done had the dossier not existed. That means they tried to influence the FBI into a smear campaign under the guise of an "official investigation" based on "credible intelligence sources." I think there is some weight to these answers, or at least enough to affect the momentum behind the whole investigation. And it is my belief that the primary force behind the investigation is political momentum. Tenchusatsu