Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : QGLY - Funny Name Great Product. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: R. M. Rosenthal who wrote (7185)	1/12/1998 9:23:00 PM
From: VIPER85730	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8960

RMR, >Glad QGLY won't have the problem, but anyone know of a thread specifically discussing companies who appear to be particularly Y2K vulnerable-- either because of what they'll have to spend to fix, or because they've been lax in starting their fix?< Good question. If you do find a thread like that, please post. But then, what company would admit it? That's my point. According to an article I read a few weeks ago, the SEC will be closely watching companies especially vulnerable to this problem. Wish I could quote from the article for you but I lent it to a friend. The article did however say that MANY companies have been very lax in addressing the issue. Sorry I couldn't be more help. I'll try to forward you the piece (If I ever get it back) VIPER----------<