Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (1059121)	3/8/2018 6:19:42 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572107

"Believing in AGW is a win win. We have nothing to lose, as long as we don't go crazy" it's a redistribution scam, carbon tax and such will crush economies. Just what the reds want. The founder of greenpeace said once the USSR fell the reds got into the Global warming scam

To: RetiredNow who wrote (1059121)	3/8/2018 8:11:57 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	3 Recommendations Recommended By i-node Mick Mørmøny RetiredNow Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572107

Mindmeld, Believing in AGW is a win win. We have nothing to lose, as long as we don't go crazy and sign up to shitty deals like the Paris Accord that was designed to impoverish Americans while subsidizing other polluting countries. I think the US should go it alone here and lead the way with a very focused, pervasive, and persistent push into new technologies that leverage renewable sources. We have very little to lose and everything to gain, including new and better jobs. I'm a firm believer in pushing new technologies that will help reduce CO2 emissions. What I don't believe in is imposing artificial quotas on CO2 emissions that are designed to punish the more prosperous nations and give the developing nations a pass. It does nothing to help the environment because the developing nations will more than make up for all of the emissions that the developed nations cut. In effect, it becomes a poorly-disguised tax on the wealthy, which is no different than socialism. And 100% of the time, socialism ends up only benefitting the central planners. Tenchusatsu