Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (8009)	1/13/1998 9:20:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Respond to of 20681

Are you guys reading the same press release I am? We got very good numbers regardless of the absence of platinum. They released what they got from Ledoux in a timely fashion and it looks very straightforward to me. If this is all we ever get we now have certification of commercially vaible gold ore. It is also worth noting the chain of custody comment is clear and unequivacating. Remember the questioning about that on the last release. And as far as JJ selling. If he decides to sell, good for him. The numbers are solid and it is time to move this company into the hands of solid mining people. I am more confident than I have been at any point.

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (8009)	1/13/1998 9:31:00 AM
From: Jim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

To All, From yesterday's 1.75 move upward with good volume, it would appear that somehow, someway, either content or news about the pending news release was known. With that in mind, I think it would be helpful if we kept today's bid/ask details as current as possible on the thread so that if the stock does look as though it is going to take wings we may all benefit... Jim

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (8009)	1/13/1998 10:25:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 20681

Richard What a bunch of hooey! Hype, confusion, and manipulation? I didn't know that you where so bitter over having sold your shares too early. When is JJ selling? What a manipulative thing YOU are trying to say. However, if I comment on your bitterniess, you just whine that I am resorting to strong arm tactics and have lost faith...Richard, the tone and content of your postings has sunk to a level where you have nothing to add... You are akin to the HL's of the world. The best part is, it doesn't matter. This thing has progresed past the point where your ill will can effect it, even on a temporary basis. It is certified, it is COC, and it is a beautiful thing. Mark

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (8009)	1/13/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: Lawrence Brierley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Richard, I frequently read your posts on other SI threads and I very much appreciate your insightful thinking, clever expressions and caustic wit. On the Naxos thread ,however, at least over the past year that I have followed it, your analysis looks to me to be very subjective and there is a degree of bitterness in your posts which I don't see much in your posts elsewhere. I cannot recall ever reading positive comments about Naxos in anything you have written and I cannot believe that any objective observer could look at the company's record over the past year and not find plenty to praise. Today's post is just another example of this lack of objectivity. This should be a landmark press release not only for Naxos, but all of the desert dirts. To date none of them have been able to unequivocally demonstrate these levels of gold. more than any other development in the dd's this release puts the lie to all of the naysayers who see nothing but SCAM writ large across this whole sector. I agree with you that the release lacked clarity. However,there is nothing arcane about the essential elements of the release, the gold numbers. I want to ask you what your agenda is with Naxos. Although I am long the stock I very much appreciate your thoughtful criticism. I know you have devoted a lot of time and analysis to the dirts and you are capable of bringing alot to to the table in these discussions. Why Naxos always seems to come in for your withering and unsubstantiated criticism escapes me. If this is all springing from some sour grapes at having missed out on the ride in this stock, then I would respectfully suggest that you revisit your decision to be out of it and soon. The removal of the injunction against company employee trading later this week likely indicates that another release is imminent and this will likely show more COC gold results, perhaps from several assay labs and, more importantly, platinum numbers. So I invite you to take a little time to prepare a reasoned post for us outlining why you feel this stock is a bad bet. I am sure that others besides myself would be most thankful if we could get away from the innuendo and judge issues more on their merits. Lawrence