Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Zentek Ltd. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NLWest who wrote (16027)	4/23/2018 10:16:41 AM
From: SWINGSFORFENCES	Respond to of 54252

Wrong choice is better than no choice.......ever hear a story about a lad named Nero?

To: NLWest who wrote (16027)	4/23/2018 10:53:43 AM
From: TargaFan	10 Recommendations Recommended By Canseco emperor gunzo Mister D Mona3 and 5 more members Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54252

The best predictor of future behaviour is to look at a persons past behaviour. So when I look at the 3 new board members and compare them to an individual who has pretty much run this company close to bankruptcy and then when is asked to a meeting acts like an emperor. Then we have a board member who is part of a company that has, if not mistaken, 500 plus million shares outstanding. I look at the past behaviour and see no good coming out of their future behaviour. I look at the 3 members along with potentially having Mr. Richardson playing a larger role then I know where to send my votes. Sure they may make a mistake but where we are and what has happened is not an option.

To: NLWest who wrote (16027)	4/23/2018 10:54:07 AM
From: Wayverider1	8 Recommendations Recommended By Canseco emperor gunzo Mister D Mona3 and 3 more members Respond to of 54252

NLWest, supposedly we’ve had a plethora of mining talent within Zen management and where has it gotten us up until now? What happens if in the last five years they’ve made a wrong choice (as you suggest)? The relationship between the current sp and the succession of decisions that management have made in the past has to be seen as accountable for our present situation. So hopefully you apply your logic of making a wrong choice to individuals who are responsible for all the wrong choices that have gotten us to this place, and less to those who you yourself acknowledge have not yet had the opportunity to make a wrong choice. And AE stumbled upon graphite, served us well in the beginning, but he by no means is a graphite expert, and we've moved on to being a graphene play, and this new emerging market is still not fully defined - so we are more in need of experienced business minds to compliment the mining background which right now too exclusively defines the BOD. We respectfully need your vote as we do that of every shareholder (so please consider). The stauts quo is grinding us to an unfortunate end game that all of us hoped we’d never see. Give change a chance, represented by people who are passionate about Zen with their own skin in the game, not someone who has become lethargic because he comes out way ahead no matter the outcome.