Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (68369)	4/25/2018 6:30:09 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361818

And some were most definitely Trump associates. Flynn and Manafort in particular. I suppose you could argue that some of the others were actually associates of Manafort and not Trump, but they were also members of the Trump campaign. Or is this one of those "it depends on how you define associates" type of things?

To: Lane3 who wrote (68369)	4/26/2018 12:29:20 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 361818

I don’t know about the terminology. But it is clearly a politically motivated attack on the president that started without the slightest evidence and appears to be ending with the same. The “crimes” discovered were all inconsequential other than the one money laundering charge which frankly, in not likely to end with a conviction. Although, it could. The DNCs civil action is just more nonsense because this is coming to a close and they can see they need some crap to get them through the election. If it isn’t a witch hunt, I don’t know what is. They don’t find anything so they start up a new discovery process to try to reuse the same fake dirt as election fodder. Remember, the entire premise was that Trump had committed wrongdoing. Else, there would have been no Mueller. I think Mueller has done an honest job and he could still have something on Trump, but it is hard to see that at this point.