Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: da_cheif™ who wrote (28263)	6/6/2018 11:51:46 AM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41547

Point well taken... 15 years isn't much. I can only wish I had become seriously interested in markets not 20, but 50 years ago. Always kept an eye on the markets, but casually. Expensive mistake. However, psychologically, Hunt has a point. Also, there is value in quant data. People study strategies going back for centuries. Antonacci's GEM would have kept investors out of every bear for the past 200 years - except for 1987. That time, events were fast, the system didn't have enough time to react. During all other Bears, it would have done quite decently, with max losses being a fraction of those of the general market.