SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Qurious who wrote (148904)9/4/2018 4:26:42 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197207
 
Since when has "interest of the industry" become a matter of concern and priority to the courts? The court's sole purpose is to enforce the law, in this case laws concerning property rights. Q's property rights are either violated or they re not. What does the interest of the industry have to do with the law?



I doubt this comes down to Q's property rights but rather how a court sees Q's FRAND obligations. The terms of which were deliberately left vague and so it will come down to how a court interprets them.

I would hope that the impact of the decision on the industry would not matter to a judge but Jeffrey has often mentioned it so I thought I would it be good to get his perspective on whether that will likely matter to a judge.

Slacker



To: Qurious who wrote (148904)9/4/2018 9:14:28 PM
From: lml1 Recommendation

Recommended By
VinnieBagOfDonuts

  Respond to of 197207
 
The court's sole purpose is to enforce the law
Court's purpose is to interpret law. Executive branch of gov't is charged with enforcing laws past by Congress. Interpretation of the should be limited to intent, but often it involves effect of its decision, & unfortunately & debatable, politics. As such decision are tailored to specifics of a case if court wishes to limit effect of decision upon others who may potentially impacted by its ruling.