Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1107089)	12/29/2018 10:14:21 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By Bonefish Mick Mørmøny Respond to of 1577194

That is Flynn's prerogative. And it is Dersh's to comment in the news about it. He makes a good argument. It makes no legal sense for an immaterial lie to be a crime. It would be like trying a kid for stealing a piece of bubblegum. There is no benefit to the public interest. I don’t know what your problem with Dershowitz is, but I do believe he's correct in this situation.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1107089)	12/30/2018 8:53:46 AM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577194

What this means: He is standing firm on his decision to plead guilty to this crime. (Gen Flynn) Now ask yourself why an innocent man would do that? The ONLY answer is quite chilling to honest law abiding citizens. Even the judge that you love to partially quote said: The judge said he “cannot recall any incident in which the court has accepted a plea of guilty from someone who maintained he was not guilty, and I don’t intend to start today.” politico.com