Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1109401)	1/10/2019 7:49:11 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570913

Carbonic acid is CO2. I can see how carbon related acidification might be a problems for sea creatures, there might be an argument for sequestering carbon for that purpose. From what I have read on the GW history though is that scientists assumed that all the extra carbon released into the air from burning oil and coal would get sucked by the Oceans. The original work by Roger Revelle showed that the Oceans were not sucking up the extra Carbon Dioxide as expected, hence the increasing percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere. or do I have that wrong?