Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carpenter who wrote (8663)	1/18/1998 5:54:00 AM
From: John Carpenter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

The previous post didn't recommend a specific course of action. Since weapons inspectors were denied access to Saddam's palaces, all of the palaces should be destroyed by a combined naval (cruise missles) and air force(stealth fighter) attack. This way it will no longer be necessary to ask Saddam's permission to enter the palaces-they will be destroyed. Actually, UNSCOM has followed a similar policy. When biological or nuclear sites are found, they are destroyed. Since Saddam refuses to show the palaces, they too should be destroyed.