Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (145421)	1/13/2019 10:43:20 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Recommended By marcher Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 217573

Airliners lost to terrorists versus USA and associations. Terrorists about half a dozen USA = Vincennes shot down an Iranian airliner Ukraine shot down a Malaysian airliner using a rocket supplied by Russia [or maybe it was Russia] after USA via Victoria F-bomb Nuland encouraged the insurrection for Obama and co. Korean airliner shot down over Kamchatka [maybe on spy/taunting mission - my 747 captain brother said it's not possible to get lost and especially there where there are big red lines warning against steering in the wrong direction]. Airliner out of New York questionable = various said a rocket went up to it. The best security is to have people not want to destroy buses, trains, airliners and people. It wasn't a thing until recent decades. Having a handgun on an airliner is probably not all that much use these days as passengers and crew will overpower the criminal in a very short time by throwing so much stuff at them and attacking them that they will not manage to shoot a lot of people and certainly not get into the cockpit. I prefer travel in the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere where airliner security is reliable [as long as pilots are not jihadist]. It's unpleasant getting near TSA. Mqurice