Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ladyPI who wrote (49399)	1/20/2019 1:01:07 PM
From: plhky3465	8 Recommendations Recommended By captcobra1 diaperdaddy drtom1234 EMU2 idahoranch1 and 3 more members Respond to of 63281

Find out what the issue is (what the issues are) first. Then do like Weatherproof suggested - think outside the box ( if necessary) to resolve. I manage a small mfg company. Several years ago we had so much business we couldnt keep up. We were working our guys as many hours as we could - in some cases 65-70 hours a week. It was VERY HARD work. And we had already found all the additional help we could in addition to sub-contracting all the work we could. Then we got the chance to do even MORE work and the customer offered to pay a PREMIUM for our products. My production mgr said NO - there's no way we can do it. Our guys cant work any more hours. I said Hold on a second. Let me think. So I went to the guys in the shop and told them about the opportunity. I offered them HALF of the PREMIUM the customer was offering us over and above the selling price he was willing to pay if they would work even more hours to build the product. So they would be getting their OT PLUS half the additional Premium that would normally go to our company. I wanted it to be a WIN-WIN. They said HELL YEAH. We got the business and had our best year ever. Look for ways to get it done Dr Behzad. You're the man. Be the ball !!

To: ladyPI who wrote (49399)	1/20/2019 2:19:20 PM
From: CelebrityEquity	1 Recommendation Recommended By EMU2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63281

Nopes....sorry. I disagree.

To: ladyPI who wrote (49399)	1/20/2019 4:15:21 PM
From: JJINV	1 Recommendation Recommended By immuapproval Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 63281

"Sell the company. Behzad," I hope he is listening... at this point could not agree more. I vote for that.

To: ladyPI who wrote (49399)	1/20/2019 4:21:02 PM
From: immuapproval	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63281

The immu grand slam homerun has Failed. There will be no 132 sold in 2019. Heck any response to a CRL takes greater than twelve months regardless of the cause. AA is gone and the valuation of immu is now less. It was certainly worth the risk to take but it failed. Now the landscape and valuation are very different. Pehl et al failed and maybe it was not his/their fault and maybe it was delaying by FDA. At this point it really is of no matter. But now you have 90-100 sales employees with nothing to do. Not to belabor the past mistakes but hiring 100 sales employees BEFORE FDA approval probably did not seem kosher to any inspectors who had questions about CMC/ process. Regardless now actually is the time for a sale BUT Houston we have a problem on what we can now get. Why you ask because the valuation/ 5 billion cap/ 28 per share was based on a "slam dunk AA approval". IF the deficiency can be CLEARLY defined maybe a big pharma can maybe do 30-35 if it can see the value in competent hands. I am stunned that immu held 13 on options expiration Friday. I had sold 250 12puts and the open 12 put interest was huge. Got lucky they were not assigned. This stock is going lower. I hope Behzad can put his EGO aside, accept the loss and just kick it like all good traders have to do when confronted with Failure. The real Crime here is that the FDA cares so little about unmet medical need TNBC patients that they could not be bothered to convey any known deficiencies before their little catch-all CRL.