Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MFG ENG who wrote (49645)	1/23/2019 5:36:07 AM
From: ghettogoulash	11 Recommendations Recommended By bobbseytwins2001 drtom1234 erippetoe idahoranch1 jargonweary and 6 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63282

I'm not sure why you are still talking about the 483 when Morgan Stanley just said, even as they simultaneously downgraded us a notch: "Mgt. indicated these issues are NOT related to the prior issues raised in the FDA 483 letter from the summer." Nevertheless, your informative and acutely specialized analyses do unveil the rigorous, almost mind-blowing specifications involved in getting this drug to the market. according to trusted sources

To: MFG ENG who wrote (49645)	1/23/2019 7:41:52 AM
From: JohnBeach	17 Recommendations Recommended By alwayshope bnutman bobbseytwins2001 captcobra1 diaperdaddy and 12 more members Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 63282

MFG ENG. Your input would have been helpful a month ago. Now, you are just pounding a drum. Everyone knows now that the CRL issues don't involve the items in the 483. You didn't have time to write a single post in 2 years, but now you found the time, post CRL, to write 8 very long posts in 3 days. Last night you took the time to write 3,088 word post on the subject. Why?

To: MFG ENG who wrote (49645)	1/23/2019 9:39:21 AM
From: jargonweary	6 Recommendations Recommended By bobbseytwins2001 diaperdaddy JohnBeach quantumup urslor and 1 more member Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 63282

Nice try...actually better than most we see here. But here’s some advice for your approach to your next target. You need to decide if you are going to present yourself as sophisticated, well informed and intelligent OR as innocent, naive and helpful. One or the other. Here, you couldn’t seem to settle on how you wanted to be perceived and it unmasked you. But, hey, when compared to others we have seen come on this board you were, as I say, better than most. Any hints where you go next? Just curious.